Depositions for proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are usually taken in the U.S. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(b)(2), (b)(3). Furthermore, many foreign jurisdictions have restrictions on taking depositions...more
A petition to institute an inter partes review (IPR) can only be filed on the basis of prior art consisting of patents and printed publications. But what makes a reference a “printed publication”? On December 20, 2019, the...more
If you don’t have new grounds to add, you may as well copycat. On September 4, 2019, the PTAB denied Microsoft’s petition requesting inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 7,167,487 (“the ’487 patent”); furthermore,...more
In a recently issued order, ALJ Lord granted-in-part and denied-in-part Respondents’ motion in limine to exclude certain testimony of Complainants’ expert. Certain Radio Frequency Microneedle Dermatological Treatment Devices...more
7/22/2019
/ Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ,
Administrative Proceedings ,
Admissible Evidence ,
Daubert Standards ,
Evidence ,
Expert Testimony ,
Expert Witness ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Motions in Limine ,
Patents ,
Section 337
In a recently issued pair of orders, ALJ Lord denied both Respondents’ and Complainants’ motions in limine to exclude certain expert testimony. Certain Radio Frequency Microneedle Dermatological Treatment Devices and...more
7/1/2019
/ Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ,
Administrative Proceedings ,
Admissible Evidence ,
Daubert Standards ,
Evidence ,
Expert Testimony ,
Expert Witness ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Motions in Limine ,
Section 337