A Florida trial court recently dismissed a personal injury lawsuit against a national retail defendant based on a novel argument created by Weber Gallagher regarding statutory condition precedent to asserting a claim for damages, and thus filing a lawsuit, under the Florida Tort Reform Act of 2023. The dismissal was granted following a motion that argued the plaintiff lacked standing to assert a claim for damages due to noncompliance with Florida Statute §768.0427.
The statute, enacted as part of the 2023 reform package, imposes specific procedural requirements for claimants seeking damages in tort actions. Among its provisions, §768.0427(3) mandates detailed disclosures for any claimant using letters of protection to seek medical treatment, including itemized billing, CPT codes, and information about third-party factoring arrangements. It also requires disclosure of referral sources, including any financial relationships between law firms and medical providers.
In this case, the defense successfully argued that the plaintiff failed to meet these statutory prerequisites, with the Court deeming these a condition precedent to filing suit. The Court agreed that without satisfying these requirements, the plaintiff was unable to assert a claim for damages and therefore did not have the standing to proceed with the lawsuit as her ability to assert her claim had not ripened. The ruling emphasized the plain language of the statute and relied on established principles of civil procedure, particularly the premise that courts cannot grant relief where statutory standing is absent. See Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330, 330, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1542 (2016).
This approach reflects a broader trend in Florida litigation to mandate discovery disclosures early in a lawsuit, to permit courts the ability to efficiently manage their case dockets. See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280. The ruling dismissing the lawsuit on the retailer’s motion harmonizes the Florida Tort Reform Act of 2023 with this trend. While the applicability of these reforms may vary by case, the condition precedent argument under §768.0427 has emerged as a strategic tool for seeking early dismissal in certain personal injury claims.
As a matter of cost effectiveness and efficiency, legal practitioners should be aware of the procedural implications of Florida’s Tort Reform Act of 2023 and evaluate whether plaintiffs have met all statutory requirements before proceeding with litigation. This case illustrated how statutory compliance can serve as a threshold issue in determining a claimant’s standing and the court’s jurisdiction to hear the matter.
This matter was handled by Antonio B. Villa de Rey, Esq. of Weber Gallagher, LLP.
[View source.]
