Ad Law News and Views - April 2025

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contact

IN THE NEWS AND LATEST UPDATES

Revolve Faces Class Action Over Influencer Posts

We recently posted about two lawsuits against Celsius and Shein alleging that the companies’ influencer campaigns were deceptive because various influencers (who were also named in the suits) failed to clearly disclose that their posts were sponsored. The firms behind those two lawsuits have teamed up for a third one, this time against Revolve and three of its influencers: Cindy Mello, Tika Camaj, and Nienke Jansz.

NAD Decision Addresses Review Claims

Yesterday, we posted about a decision in which P&G challenged claims that Rascals made about the absorption capabilities of its diapers. Rascals also advertised: ​“210,000+ 5-star reviews of Rascals Products.” P&G thought something about that claim smelled funny and challenged that, too.

The Bulk Data Access Rule: What Advertisers Need to Know

On April 11, the Department of Justice issued an extensive set of FAQs on its Bulk Data Access Rule and advised that it ​“will not prioritize civil enforcement actions against any person for violations” of the Rule through July 8, 2025, ​“so long as the person is engaging in good faith efforts” to comply with the Rule. (DOJ refers to the ​“Data Security Program” or ​“DSP.” We refer to ​“the Rule” to emphasize that it is a legally binding regulation with obligations that extend beyond data protection.)

NAD Decision Addresses Torture Tests

Rascals advertises that the Hydrolock Core in its diapers ​“holds up to 25 x its weight” and ​“absorbs 15 x its weight.” P&G thought that claim was full of crap and filed a challenge before the NAD, arguing that Rascals supported its claims with tests that didn’t mirror real-world use. NAD’s decision holds valuable lessons for advertisers across industries.

New Jersey Attorney General Sues Discord Over Youth Privacy Practices

Last week, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin announced a lawsuit against Discord, Inc., a popular messaging application provider, for allegedly misleading parents about the efficacy of its safety controls and obscuring risks facing children on the application.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Written by:

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide