And Then There Were Nine: Disappearing OHRP To Join Enforcement Agency; NIH Cuts Outlined

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA)
Contact

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA)

Report on Research Compliance 22, no. 5 (May, 2025)

When it comes to changes roiling the federally supported research landscape, April offered no letup from the first three months of the year; if anything, the pace and magnitude increased. In one instance, an agency—the HHS Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)—has been thrown into a “crisis” and is down to nine employees. It would be fully staffed with 40 but has been underfunded for years. In 2022, it had 20 employees and was hobbling along then.[1]

As RRC was going to press, OHRP Director Molly Klote—who is appealing her April 1 reduction-in-force notice—unofficially announced the retirement of four OHRP staff, including longtime deputy director Julie Kaneshiro, who joined OHRP in 2002, and Lisa Buchanan, OHRP’s director of the Division of Compliance Oversight since 2019 and an OHRP employee since 2008.

The decline to nine employees as of April 20 was the result of retirements, loss of a probationary employee, Klote’s termination, more routine job changes and the federalwide job freeze. Natalie Klein, director of OHRP’s Division of Policy and Assurances, is now “the director of everything,” in the words of an agency employee who also referred to the staffing level as a crisis and requested anonymity.

Meanwhile, in whatever form it continues to exist, both OHRP and the Office of Research Integrity are scheduled to move to a new umbrella office, the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement, joining the Office for Civil Rights and two others, according to a leaked White House fiscal year 2026 budget document that also outlined HHS’ reorganization plan.

But more shocking was the bottom line for NIH: a 40% reduction, with funding dropping from $47 billion to $27 billion dispersed between eight institutes or centers, compared to the current 27. Overall, HHS’ budget would decline by a third. The plan also calls for the imposition of a 15% cap on facilities and administrative (F&A) costs for awards—a move NIH has already tried and is appealing after losing a lower court ruling.

Regardless of one’s view of the changes, “you have to recognize that the pace is extraordinary,” Heather Pierce, senior director for science policy and regulatory counsel for the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), told RRC. “The pace of change, of news, of uncertainty…it’s exhausting for the research community.”

Since early February, Pierce has given dozens of talks and interviews on the F&A rates, grant terminations and the impact of changes at NIH. “I have had to stop using slides because they’re outdated—as I am walking into the room” to present them, she said. “So now it’s become like my shtick. Every time I talk, I start with: ‘I have breaking news!’”

She half-jokingly noted the need for more adjectives for unprecedented. “If you have more, will you send them? Because I am out,” said Pierce.

[View source.]

Written by:

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA)
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide