Can a Dominant Health Insurer’s Refusal to Negotiate in Good Faith Be Actionable under the Antitrust Laws? Yes, Says a Federal Court in Rhode Island

Polsinelli
Contact

On April 23, a federal court in Rhode Island fired a warning shot over the bow of dominant health insurers across the country, holding that a refusal to negotiate in good faith with a healthcare provider that focuses population health management in an attempt to block its entry could violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Polsinelli
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Polsinelli on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide