CFPB indicates its Section 1033 rule should be set aside in filing

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On May 23, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky received a status report from the defendants, the CFPB and Russell Vought, stating that the Bureau has determined the Section 1033 rule to be unlawful and should be set aside. The defendants announced their intention to file a motion for summary judgment by May 30, in line with the existing briefing schedule set by the court’s March 27 order. This decision follows a joint motion to stay proceedings filed by the parties to allow time for the Bureau’s new leadership to review the rule.

As previously covered by InfoBytes, several banking entities filed suit seeking to halt the CFPB’s Section 1033 final rule, which addresses personal financial data rights under 12 C.F.R. Part 1033. Following a 30-day stay in this case, the court granted a fintech trade association’s motion to intervene in this case (covered here) and emphasized the importance of adhering to the established briefing schedule.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide