Class Action Decisions Published January 2025 - Developments in Class Action Law

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Highlights from this issue include: 

  • Pro Se Civil Rights Class Actions. The Seventh Circuit affirmed that a pro se prisoner cannot adequately represent a class.
  • Concrete Damages after TransUnion. The Fourth Circuit noted that under TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, “[e]very class member must have Article standing” “for each claim that they press,” which required proof that the challenged conduct caused each of them a concrete harm, and that the class cannot rely on a “mere risk of future harm.”
  • Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The Third Circuit affirmed the denial of certification for a class that alleged violations of the TCPA because to determine whether any individual class member had provided consent would require individualized review and mini-trials.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Written by:

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide