Class Action Decisions Published May 2025

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Highlights from this issue include: 

  • Immigration. There were many decisions by classes seeking certification of habeas claims related to President Donald Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act that reached different decisions on whether to certify classes.
  • CAFA Removal. The Northern District of California remanded to state court a wage and hour case removed to federal court under Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) because (1) the defendant relied on unreasonable assumptions to calculate unpaid overtime wages, unpaid minimum wages, and liquidated damages, and (2) the defendant relied on the Ninth Circuit’s benchmark for common fund class actions to calculate estimated attorneys’ fees, when the fee-shifting statute at issue was calculated using the lodestar method.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Written by:

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide