Colorado Court of Appeals Says Employers May Not Deduct Product Fees That Are Costs of Business From an Employee’s Wages

Clark Hill PLC
Contact

The Colorado Court of Appeals held that deducting product fees from an employee’s wages unlawfully shifts the burden of an employer’s business costs and reduces an employee’s wages.

In 303 Beauty v. Division of Labor (Colo. Feb. 20, 2025), employer Hair Salon paid its employee cosmetologist wages and a commission based on her sales of services and retail products. Additionally, the salon and cosmetologist entered into a written agreement authorizing the salon to deduct from the employee’s pay fees for hair care products, such as hair color and dyes, that she used in the course of providing services to the salon’s customers. The court determined that the agreement was improper, finding those expenses were part of the salon’s cost of doing business and could not be shifted to employees.

The court analyzed section 8-4-105(1)(b), C.R.S. 2024 of the Wage Act which intends to protect employees from unlawful wage deductions. C.R.S. 8-4-105(1) states:

“[a]n employer shall not make a deduction from the wages or compensation of an employee except as follows:

. . .

Deductions for loans, advances, goods or services, and equipment or property provided by an employer to an employee pursuant to a written agreement between such employer and employee, so long as it is enforceable and not in violation of the law.”

Because the Wage Act does not define “goods or services,“ the court looked to other exceptions within the section that were defined. The court noted that “loans and advances – directly benefit employees, without an obvious benefit to employers.” In keeping with the statutory construction principle that terms within a list should be interpreted as having a related meaning, the court decided that goods and services should be interpreted as those business costs that benefit an employer.

The court concluded the product fees inherent to an employee’s job that benefit the employer, even if the employee mutually benefits, are costs of business and thereby an unlawful deduction from an employee’s wages, regardless of a lawful written agreement.

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment’s Division of Labor Standards and Statistics’ decision that deducting employer’s costs of doing business from an employee’s pay is unenforceable under section 8-4-105(1)(b).

Key Takeaway

Employers such as hair salons, where product fees may be deducted from an employee’s wage, should review their policies and agreements and consider whether those products are a cost of business and therefore not properly a pay deduction. Note that this decision does not apply to business reimbursements.

Law clerk Lauren Tesler contributed to this article. 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Clark Hill PLC

Written by:

Clark Hill PLC
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Clark Hill PLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide