Court Holds Wellness Program Does Not Violate ADA

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact

The Applicable Law. The ADA, which is enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), prohibits employers and other covered entities from requiring a medical examination, asking an employee whether he or she is disabled or inquiring about the nature or severity of any disability unless there is a business necessity for the exam or inquiry, and it is job related. There is an exception to this business necessity rule for certain voluntary arrangements, which the EEOC enforcement manual says includes a wellness program in which participation is optional, and the employer does not penalize employees who refuse to participate in it. The EEOC staff has informally questioned whether providing a financial incentive, such as a premium discount for participation in a wellness program, may cause a wellness plan to be involuntary under this standard.

Another exception to the general business necessity rule for medical exams and inquiries provides that the ADA is not to be interpreted to prohibit a covered entity from “establishing … or administering the terms of a bona fide benefit plan that are based on underwriting risks, classifying risks, or administering such risks that are based on or not inconsistent with State law.” This exception is generally referred to as the insurance safe harbor.

The Broward County Program. In 2009, Broward County, Florida, implemented a wellness program under which employees would complete a confidential online health risk assessment and have a confidential blood test for glucose and cholesterol levels. These two tools were used to determine their propensity for one of five diseases, such as diabetes or hypertension, and employees who were at risk had the opportunity to enroll in disease management programs. The employees were not required to participate in the wellness program to enroll in the County’s health plan; however, beginning in 2010, employees who declined to participate in the program were charged $20 per biweekly pay period.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide