Delaware Enacts Sweeping Changes for Conflict Transactions and Books and Records Demands

Cooley LLP
Contact

Cooley LLP

Last week, as noted in this detailed blog by Cooley’s Cydney Posner, the sweeping – and somewhat controversial – changes to the Delaware General Corporation Law were signed into law. Now, the new “safe harbor” provisions designed to cleanse conflict transactions involving directors, officers and controlling stockholders are effective, as well as the amendments that significantly narrow the categories of information subject to a books and records demand.

Here’s a set of bullets describing the changes:

1. Conflict transactions involving directors and officers

  • New safe harbor provisions for conflict transactions under Section 144(a)
  • Transactions can be protected from legal action if:
    • Approved in good faith by disinterested directors
    • Approved by disinterested stockholders
    • Deemed fair to the corporation and stockholders
  • Removes previous timing requirements for special committees
  • Allows special committees to not be entirely composed of disinterested directors

2.  Presumption of director disinterest

  • Public company directors can be presumed disinterested if they meet stock exchange standards
  • This presumption can be rebutted with substantial evidence of material conflict

3.  Conflict transactions with controlling stockholders

  • New provisions under Section 144(b) for transactions involving controlling stockholders
  • Transactions can be protected if:
    • Disclosed to a special committee with negotiation authority
    • Approved by disinterested stockholders
    • Deemed fair to the corporation and stockholders
  • Differs from previous law by only requiring approval from either a special committee or disinterested stockholders (previously required both)

4.  Go-private transactions

  • New Section 144(c) provides protection for go-private transactions
  • Transactions can be protected if:
    • Approved by a special committee and disinterested stockholders
    • Deemed fair to the corporation and stockholders
  • Preserves the MFW doctrine for scrutiny under the business judgment rule

5.  Definition of “controlling stockholder”

  • New definition under Section 144(e)(2)
  • Considered a controlling stockholder if they:
    • Wield majority power
    • Can designate majority of board members
    • Control at least one-third of voting stock and have managerial authority

6.  Liability protections

  • Controlling stockholders can’t be liable for monetary damages for breach of duty of care
  • No need for an “opt-in” certificate of incorporation provision

7. Books and records demands

  • Significantly narrows stockholder access to corporate documents
  • Limited to specific types of documents, including:
    • Corporate incorporation documents
    • Bylaws
    • Meeting minutes (for past three years)
    • Written communications to stockholders
    • Board meeting materials
    • Annual financial statements
    • Stockholders agreements
    • Director and officer independence questionnaires
  • Maintains ability to seek additional records during active litigation or with demonstrated compelling need

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Cooley LLP

Written by:

Cooley LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Cooley LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide