FDA Proposes Draft Guidance on Assessing the Credibility of AI Models Used in Drug and Biological Product Submissions

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

The FDA has shared its first draft guidance on how sponsors should assess the credibility of artificial intelligence (AI) models to support FDA decisions regarding drug safety, effectiveness or quality.

The agency noted an “exponential increase” in the use of AI in drug development and regulatory submissions in the last several years.

A Risk-Based Credibility Assessment

Like the FDA’s draft guidance for AI-enabled medical devices, this guidance envisions a risk-based framework to evaluate a model’s credibility for a particular context of use.

In the context of AI models, the FDA considers “credibility” to refer to trust established through collecting “credibility evidence.” That evidence can support the credibility of a particular AI model output for a specific context of use.

The activities used to establish credibility should be commensurate with the model risk and tailored to a specific context of use, the agency said.

A Framework for Assessing Risk

The FDA recommends sponsors follow these seven steps to for assess an AI model’s credibility:

  1. Define the question the AI model will address.
  2. Define the context of use.
  3. Assess the AI model risk.
  4. Develop a plan to establish the credibility of AI model output within the context of use.
  5. Execute the plan.
  6. Document and discuss the plan results.
  7. Determine the model’s adequacy for the context of use.

Engaging Early

The FDA encourages sponsors to engage early with the agency to:

  • Set expectations regarding the credibility assessment based on the proposed model’s risk and context of use.
  • Help identify potential challenges and how to address them.

What’s next?

The FDA is seeking public comments on the draft guidance until April 7.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide