Federal Court Dismisses Antitrust Claims Against Private Equity Firm

Troutman Pepper

[co-author: Stephanie Kozol]*

Private equity firms can breathe a sigh of relief after a federal judge dismissed claims that threatened to establish a precedent for holding private equity firms liable for certain actions by their portfolio companies.

The Antitrust Lawsuit

On September 21, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed suit against U.S. Anesthesia Partners (USAP) and Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe (WCAS), a private equity firm that held a minority interest in USAP. The lawsuit centered on alleged antitrust violations based on USAP’s “roll-up” acquisition strategy—acquiring numerous anesthesia services groups across Texas. The FTC alleged that WCAS and USAP were involved in a “multi-year anticompetitive scheme” that would drive up the price of anesthesia services in Texas.

WCAS formed USAP in 2012. It currently holds a 23% stake in the company. Despite the minority ownership, the FTC nevertheless argued that WCAS should be held liable for the ongoing antitrust violations based on its equity ownership in USAP.

Dismissal of Claims Against WCAS

On May 13, 2024, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas rejected the FTC’s arguments and dismissed the claims as to WCAS. The court noted an utter lack of support for “the proposition that receiving profits from an entity that may be violating antitrust laws is itself a violation of antitrust laws.” The court further emphasized that the FTC failed to cite any case “in which a minority, noncontrolling investor—however hands-on—is liable . . . because the company it partially owned made anticompetitive acquisitions.”

Implications

State and federal regulators inside and outside of the FTC have recently pushed to expand their authority by advancing novel theories that would allow claims not only against consumer-facing businesses, but also the companies that own or invest in them. The USAP decision is a big victory for private equity firms, as they will be able to use the holding to push back against regulators who attempt to drag them into costly litigation, continue to pursue investments in serial acquirers without fear of direct liability for their actions.

*Senior Government Relations Manager

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Troutman Pepper Locke

Written by:

Troutman Pepper Locke
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Troutman Pepper Locke on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide