Federal Court Suspends Enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act’s Reporting Requirements

White and Williams LLP
Contact

White and Williams LLP

[co-author: Sofia Villalobos Vega]

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the federal government from enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act[1] (the “CTA”) nationwide. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex.).[2] Under the CTA, reporting companies were required to submit Beneficial Ownership Information (“BOI”) reports to the United States Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) before the January 1, 2025, deadline. The Court’s preliminary injunction has suspended enforcement of the reporting requirements temporarily.

The Texas Top Cop Shop Court held that the CTA’s BOI reporting requirements[3] to FinCEN were likely unconstitutional as a Congressional overstep of its Commerce Clause authority. In the Court’s view, enforcement of the CTA would be, in effect, a “rubber stamp on a new form of federal power,” and that “[f]or good reason, Plaintiffs fear this quasi-Orwellian statute and its implications on our dual system of government.”[4] Further, Judge Amos L. Mazzant III wrote, its implementation could irreparably harm reporting companies.[5]

As a result of the Court’s decision, FinCEN is currently prohibited from enforcing any of the CTA’s penalties for noncompliance. Reporting companies need not comply with the CTA’s upcoming January 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline, pending further order of the Court or a higher court. Reporting companies may, however, continue to file such reports on a voluntary basis on the FinCEN website. For the latest updates on the CTA, please contact your White and Williams LLP attorney or the below authors. There is also a considerable amount of information available on the Department of Justice[6] or FinCEN[7] official government websites.

[1] 31 U.S.C. § 5336

[2] To read the full opinion, please visit: https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/TexasTopCopShopIncetalvGarlandetalDocketNo424cv00478EDTexMay28202?doc_id=X3PI3GTJP5E9HSPN0JK6CAU8E8G

[3] 31 C.F.R. 1010.380

[4] Id. at 46.

[5] Id. at 24.

[6] https://www.justice.gov/

[7] https://boiefiling.fincen.gov/

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© White and Williams LLP

Written by:

White and Williams LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

White and Williams LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide