On Tuesday, December 3, 2024, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order in favor of the plaintiffs in Texas Cop Shop, Inc. et al. v. Garland et al., granting the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction against enforcement of the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements established by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA).
The court’s order blocks the US Department of the Treasury and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) from enforcing the CTA and the BOI reporting requirements established by rule pending further order of the court. Importantly, unlike a district court order issued by a federal court in Alabama earlier in 2024, the Texas Cop Shop order applies nationwide, to all reporting companies, and not just to the plaintiffs in the case.
Pursuant to the CTA and the BOI reporting rule, unless exempt, any company formed in the US, or any foreign company that registers to do business in the US, by filing a document with a secretary of state or similar office is a covered “reporting company” that must submit information to FinCEN about the company and its beneficial owners (as defined by the CTA and by rule). Many companies formed or registered in the US in 2024 had already been subject to the CTA because of the 90-day reporting requirement for companies formed or registered in 2024.
However, for companies formed or registered in the US on or before December 31, 2023, the rule requires initial reports to be filed no later than January 1, 2025, as discussed further in this September 2024 Cooley alert. Therefore, but for the court’s order, many companies would have needed to submit their filings in the next few weeks if they had not done so already.
In other words, pending any further developments, companies subject to the January 1, 2025, deadline are not required to file their initial BOI reports at this time. Similarly, companies that have already filed initial BOI reports are not, at this time, required to file updated reports reflecting changes to previously reported information. That said, the court’s order is a preliminary injunction based on a finding that the CTA and the reporting rule are “likely unconstitutional” (emphasis in original), and the ultimate outcome of the litigation remains to be seen. If the order is lifted, reporting companies may once again be required to file and/or update reports.
Covered entities should continue to monitor for updates or additional guidance.
This communication and any related article, webinar or presentation provides general information about the CTA. These communications do not constitute legal advice, and we encourage you to consult with an attorney for advice tailored to your specific situation.
Please note that Cooley provides advice related to CTA compliance only to current clients of the firm – and only when we are expressly asked and agree to do so in writing.
These communications do not create an attorney-client relationship between Cooley and you or your company, or create any duties to provide advice with respect to the CTA. Cooley is not responsible for updating you or your company about developments regarding the CTA, including with regard to this preliminary injunction.
[View source.]
