House confirms favorable modifications to three key business tax provisions

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

On May 12, 2025, the Republicans on the House Committee on Ways and Means released a draft bill showing their tax plan for the budget reconciliation legislation. The legislation will likely undergo significant changes as it works its way through the broader House membership and Senate. Among the myriad of new and revised provisions, the bill contains favorable updates to three key business tax provisions from 2017’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). More specifically, the bill as currently drafted includes an extension of 100% bonus depreciation, a return to full, immediate expensing for domestic research and experimental expenditures, and adjustments to the business interest expense limitation taking into consideration EBITDA, as opposed to merely EBIT. While the final content of this bill is expected to change, in this initial draft, taxpayers should appreciate the efforts made by the House to modify these three key business tax provisions favorably.

Extension of 100% Bonus Depreciation

Current Section 168(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) allows taxpayers to take an additional depreciation deduction (bonus depreciation) equal to the “applicable percentage” of the adjusted basis of qualified property acquired after September 17, 2017. For property placed in service after September 27, 2017, and prior to January 1, 2023 (January 1, 2024, for certain property), the applicable percentage was equal to 100%. Pursuant to a phase-out rule, the applicable percentage decreases in 20% increments in each taxable year beginning after December 31, 2022 (January 1, 2024, for certain property). As a result, bonus depreciation is set to completely phase out for property placed in service after December 31, 2026 (December 31, 2027, for certain property). Taxpayers may elect out of bonus depreciation for any class of qualified property for any taxable year. The proposed bill language retains the phase-out of bonus depreciation but only for property acquired prior to January 20, 2025. It also clarifies that the applicable percentage will be 0% for property acquired prior to January 20, 2025, and placed in service after December 31, 2026. 

The key change proposed in the bill pertains to bonus depreciation for property acquired after January 19, 2025. For property in this category, the applicable percentage is 100% if the property is placed in service before January 1, 2030. The proposed bill does not include any tiered phase-out similar to the TCJA, meaning that any qualified property acquired on or after January 20, 2025, and placed in service before January 1, 2030, would be eligible for a 100% bonus depreciation in the placement in service year.

In addition to bringing back 100% depreciation for qualifying property under Section 168(k), the proposed bill also adds Section 168(n) to the Code providing a 100% deduction for the cost of certain new factories, certain improvements to existing factories, and certain other structures. Under current law, a taxpayer is generally required to depreciate the costs of nonresidential real property over a 39-year period. The new provision contains a number of defined terms and operative provisions for taxpayers to consider in determining whether they qualify for this new benefit provided, offered as an incentive for domestic manufacturing.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: Bonus depreciation was initially introduced in 2002 and it has continued to be enacted at varied rates because it incentivizes investment in machinery and equipment, increasing productivity, and thus, economic growth. Under current law, there would be no bonus depreciation available for most property placed in service after December 31, 2026. The proposed language would greatly expand the availability of bonus depreciation for qualified property acquired on or after January 20, 2025. However, it would not change the reduced availability of bonus depreciation for property acquired by the taxpayer prior to January 20, 2025. Although the return of 100% bonus depreciation and the lack of the phase-out of the applicable percentages for bonus depreciation are generally taxpayer favorable, it will be key to track the language of the final bill. If it remains the same as in the current draft, taxpayers will need to consider when qualified property was acquired as well as incentives under Section 168(n) to determine the proper treatment of depreciable assets.

For the same reasons, it will be important for taxpayers to track any changes in the legislative language, especially key terms in the statute. As noted, annual bonus depreciation has varied from 20% to 100%. Additionally, the determination of “qualified property“ is currently limited to property with a recovery period of 20 years or less. Should Congress seek additional stimulus, qualified property could be modified to include other asset classes. Further, previous iterations of bonus depreciation have included not only “original use property,” but also “used property,” or property meeting specific “acquisition requirements.” With considerations being given to Section 168(n) and a domestic manufacturing incentive, bonus depreciation eligibility is even more important. Variations in previous iterations of bonus depreciation provisions make clear that Congress may tweak the statute to expand or contract the availability of bonus depreciation.

It is also worth highlighting that, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, the draft bill raises the threshold under Section 179 for expensing of certain qualifying depreciable business assets from $1 million to $2.5 million, reduced by the amount by which the cost of qualifying property placed in service during the taxable year exceeds $4 million. As provisions in the draft bill continue to be tinkered with, to the extent a company utilizes the depreciation deduction available under Section 179, taxpayers will want to confirm the dollar limitations remaining in the statute.


Expensing of Domestic R&E Expenditures

Prior to the TCJA, Section 174 permitted taxpayers to elect to deduct R&E expenditures currently, to capitalize and amortize R&E expenditures over a period of not less than five years, or to charge R&E expenditures to capital account. Pre-TCJA, if a taxpayer elected to deduct under Section 174, the deduction was generally reduced by the amount of the taxpayer’s Section 41 research credit. To prevent this result, former Section 280C(c)(3) provided an election for taxpayers to preserve the full deduction under Section 174 by allowing a taxpayer to elect to reduce its Section 41 research credit.

The TCJA amended Section 174 to require a taxpayer to charge specified research or experimental expenditures “to a capital account” and to amortize the expenditures over five (domestic research) or fifteen (foreign research) years. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021, specified R&E expenditures include software development costs. The amount chargeable to capital account under Section 174 for a given taxable year is generally reduced by the amount by which a taxpayer’s research credit under Section 41 for the taxable year exceeds the amount allowed as an annual deduction under Section 174. Taxpayers may alternatively make a reduced credit election under Section 280C(c)(2).

The proposed bill would suspend the application of Section 174 to domestic R&E expenditures for amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, and before January 1, 2030. The language also includes a temporary Section 174A, which applies to taxable years in this period. Under proposed Section 174A(a), a taxpayer is able to currently deduct domestic R&E expenditures paid or incurred during the taxable year. The taxpayer may alternatively elect to charge domestic R&E expenditures to capital account and amortize the expenses over a period of at least 60 months. The proposal would also amend Section 280C(c) to require the reduction of the R&E expenditures taken into account under Section 174A by the amount of the Section 41 credit. 

At the end of the temporary period covered by Section 174A, the bill treats the application of Section 174 in the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2029. as a change in method of accounting for purposes of Section 481. This change in method of accounting is treated as initiated by the taxpayer, made with the Commissioner’s consent, and applied prospectively on a cut-off basis.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: The proposed changes would be beneficial to taxpayers conducting domestic research by allowing an option to currently deduct R&E expenses through 2030. However, there would be no similar benefit to taxpayers which conduct research outside of the United States. As with the TCJA, the draft bill provides for the same treatment coming off as coming in, and taxpayers will want to stay well aware of the procedural accounting method provisions that enable companies to utilize the provision. As Congress continues to evaluate the draft bill, it will be interesting to see whether and to what extent clarification is provided with respect to the interplay with research credits under Section 41, and the availability of the election under Section 280C(c) and whether any relief is provided for inadvertent elections.


Extension of Allowance for Depreciation, Amortization, or Depletion in Determining the Limitation on Business Interest

The TCJA also changed the treatment of business interest expense under Section 163(j). Under present law, a taxpayer’s business interest expense deduction is limited for a given tax year to the sum of (i) the taxpayer’s business interest income for the year, (ii) 30 percent of the taxpayer’s adjusted taxable income (ATI) for the year, but not less than zero, and (iii) the taxpayer’s floor plan financing interest for the year. ATI generally refers to a taxpayer’s taxable income computed without regard to certain items, including any income, gain, deduction, or loss not properly allocable to a trade or business; business interest or business interest income; net operating loss deductions under Section 172; and deductions allowed under Section 199A. For taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2022, ATI was computed without regard to any deduction allowable for depreciation, amortization, or depletion. However, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021, depreciation, amortization, and depletion deductions are included in computing ATI. The amount of disallowed business interest may be carried forward indefinitely to future taxable years. Consistent with taxable years beginning before January 1, 2022, the proposed bill would temporarily exclude depreciation, amortization, or depletion deductions for purposes of computing ATI under Section 163(j). More specifically, under the proposed bill, the exclusion of depreciation, amortization, or depletion for purposes of computing ATI would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, and prior to January 1, 2030.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: For many taxpayers, under current law, the inclusion of depreciation, amortization, and depletion deductions in computing ATI lowers the taxpayer’s ATI, which reduces the amount of business interest expense that is deductible under Section 163(j) in any given year. The proposed exclusion of depreciation, amortization, and depletion deductions in computing ATI for taxable years from 2025-2029 may result in a greater amount of ATI for taxpayers with depreciation, amortization, or depletion, which may lessen the impact of the Section 163(j) limitation. Note that as drafted, the exclusion of depreciation, amortization, and depletion deductions in computing ATI does not apply to taxable years 2022, 2023, or 2024.

With these three provisions, it will be important for taxpayers to continue to monitor the final language of the bill which could change dramatically given the differing budget proposals, challenges of cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, the impact of the moving target with respect to the SALT cap, as well as competing interests associated with the myriad provisions in this draft bill. For these reasons, it is possible the final version of any tax bill will be significantly revised from this current draft. 

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide