June Tip of the Month: Supreme Court Decision Levels the Playing Field for “Reverse Discrimination” Claims

Perkins Coie
Contact

Perkins Coie

On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, holding that members of a majority group are not required to meet a heightened evidentiary standard to prevail on a Title VII discrimination claim.

This case—which lowers the bar for “reverse discrimination” claims—reached the Supreme Court after several federal courts of appeals had imposed an additional burden on majority-group plaintiffs requiring them to present “background circumstances” evidence, such as statistical data demonstrating a pattern of discrimination, to establish a prima facie case of discrimination under Title VII. The Supreme Court rejected this approach in Ames. The Ames decision serves as a critical reminder that decisions affecting any employees must be based on legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons, as members of majority and minority groups are equally positioned to pursue discrimination claims. The ruling may also embolden legal challenges to DEI programs, underscoring the importance of carefully reviewing such programs to ensure compliance with applicable law.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Perkins Coie

Written by:

Perkins Coie
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Perkins Coie on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide