Meet the New Boss – Same as the Old Boss? Cryptic FTC Filings Suggest Non-Compete Ban May Not Be Dead After All

Fisher Phillips
Contact

Fisher Phillips

Most observers following the saga of the Federal Trade Commission’s non-compete ban expected a final nail in the coffin last week – voluntary dismissal of the appeal that Biden-era leadership filed to keep the ban alive. That didn’t happen. Instead, the FTC, now run by a 3-0 Republican majority, filed an original and “corrected” motion for additional time on July 10 that raises serious questions about whether the FTC will try keep the ban alive, despite its current Commissioners’ forceful rebukes of the rule when it originally passed. Employers don’t need to take any action, yet, but this has gone from an afterthought to an issue to watch.

Background

Here’s a quick review of how we’ve gotten to this point.

No Death Knell Yet

Most observers anticipated that, by July 10, the FTC would dismiss its appeal of the Ryan decision (and the more limited decision from Florida in the Properties of the Villages case, which is pending before the 11th Circuit) and discontinue its defense of the non-compete ban.

That is not what happened. Late last week, the FTC filed an original and a “corrected” status report and motion to hold the appeal in abeyance for 60 additional days. The sole difference between the original and “corrected” motion is interesting and possibly telling.

  • The original motion said, “The Chairman of the Commission continues to believe that the Commission should reconsider its defense of the rule challenged in this case, although some additional time is necessary to allow for that reconsideration.”
  • The “corrected” motion replaced that sentence with the following: “In light of these [personnel] changes and the press of Commission business, some additional time is necessary to determine whether the Commission should reconsider its defense of the rule challenged in this case.” (emphasis added)

Reading the Tea Leaves

Why did the FTC feel the need to “correct” the statement that Chairman Ferguson “continues to believe that the Commission should reconsider its defense of the rule”? And why does the “corrected” motion indicate that the FTC still needs to decide “whether” it will reconsider its defense of the rule?

One wonders why the 3-0 Republican-dominated FTC needs so much time to decide whether it will fight for a rule Chairman Ferguson characterized as “by far the most extraordinary assertion of authority in the Commission’s history,” among other sharp critiques.

The FTC very well may dismiss the Ryan appeal in due course, and this could be an innocent timing issue.

But if the Republican-controlled FTC decides to fight for the Biden-era non-compete ban, which its Commissioners so harshly criticized, it will be a stunning reversal. Even if that happens, the FTC would still face steep odds getting the lower court decision overturned, no matter who’s in charge.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Fisher Phillips

Written by:

Fisher Phillips
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Fisher Phillips on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide