Smartmatic USA Corp. v. SGO Corp Ltd., 2023 WL 2626882 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty. 2023)
Generally, litigation funding loans are not discoverable in personal injury actions. These are “loans” given to injured plaintiffs as an advance on any settlement or verdict they might obtain. These “loans” are not subject to usury rates. However, in Smartmatic, the court allowed for discovery of a litigation funding loan because it was material and necessary to the defendant’s anti-SLAPP counterclaim, which involved an element of the plaintiff’s financial motivation to sue. While this should not allow for blanket disclosure of these “loans,” in a personal injury case where there are claims that the accident was fraudulent, Smartmatic does provide a basis to argue that discovery of these agreements is warranted.