Ninth Circuit sides with credit union after finding NCUA regulations preempted California state law

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On August 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) against a federal credit union, holding that federal law preempts state regulation of credit union account fees. The case arose from a customer’s claim that a $15 returned-check fee — for which he was not at fault — was an unfair and unlawful business practice under the UCL. The 9th Circuit rejected the claims on the basis of preemption, citing 12 C.F.R. § 701.35, which provides that “[a] federal credit union is empowered to determine … fees or charges [in connection with check deposits] … [and to] the extent that state law attempts to regulate such activity, it is preempted.” The appeals court emphasized that all state laws regulating account fees — whether general or specific — do not apply to federal credit unions. The decision aligned with those of other courts and noted the credit union stopped charging returned check fees as of November 1, 2023.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide