NJ Supreme Court Holds Municipalities Can Be Sanctioned for Frivolous Litigation

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact

Fox Rothschild LLP

Municipalities are not immune from sanctions under the state’s Frivolous Litigation Statute, the New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled in an appeal that stemmed from affordable housing litigation.

In a unanimous decision, the court upheld more than $200,000 in sanctions against the Borough of Englewood Cliffs, which pursued claims against its former legal counsel that the justices found were filed in bad faith.

The case arose from a separate action that began in 2015 in which a developer challenged the borough’s lack of compliance with its affordable housing mandate.

During that dispute, the borough’s attorneys advised the municipality to settle because of the weaknesses in the borough’s case. Ignoring its attorneys, the borough opted to go to trial anyway, where it ultimately lost. The borough later settled with the developer to address its affordable housing obligations.

However, after a change in political leadership and resulting shake-up, the borough filed a new lawsuit against its former attorneys and the property developer, asserting claims of professional malpractice, breach of contract and civil conspiracy.

Immunity Defense Rejected

The trial court dismissed the case as frivolous and imposed sanctions. The borough appealed, arguing that as a municipality, it could not be held liable under the statute.

Now the Supreme Court has rejected that argument. It held that municipalities are subject to sanctions like any other litigant and are not protected by sovereign immunity for engaging in frivolous litigation.

The court found that the “sole purpose” of the borough’s lawsuit “was to harass, delay and cause malicious injury” to the borough’s former lawyers and the developer. As a result, the court held that sanctions upwards of $200,000 were appropriate.

The court’s decision sends a strong message to municipalities that they must turn square corners and are not above the law. As the affordable housing process heats up in New Jersey’s Fourth Round, municipalities should take note that they cannot escape liability for bad faith and frivolous filings.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Fox Rothschild LLP

Written by:

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Fox Rothschild LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide