Ohio Supreme Court Holds Hearing on Arbitration Not Required if Parties Do Not Request It

McGlinchey Stafford
Contact

McGlinchey Stafford

In a unanimous opinion, the Ohio Supreme Court held that a trial court is not required to first hold an oral hearing on a motion to compel arbitration under Ohio’s Arbitration Act (R.C. 2711 et. seq.) if no party requests a hearing. Ohio courts had been split on whether Ohio’s Arbitration Act required an oral hearing before a court could grant a motion to compel arbitration. But, as the Ohio Supreme Court unanimously found, no such hearing is required if no party requests one under the doctrine of “party presentation.” 

As the Court noted:

“[u]nder the principle of party presentation, ‘we rely on the parties to frame the issues for decision and assign to courts the role of neutral arbiter of matters the parties present.’” In this case, since no party actually requested an oral hearing, the appellate court erred by reversing the trial court’s decision compelling arbitration on the ground that no oral hearing occurred.

Snyder makes clear that if a party desires oral argument on a motion to compel arbitration, it must explicitly request one. 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© McGlinchey Stafford

Written by:

McGlinchey Stafford
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

McGlinchey Stafford on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide