Recent Greenwashing Litigation Focuses on Consumer Products

Mintz
Contact

Mintz

Over the past couple of weeks, there have been a pair of greenwashing lawsuits filed--by both private plaintiffs and government regulators--that highlight the current focus on consumer products as a centerpiece of greenwashing litigation. Specifically, a private plaintiff brought a consumer-protection lawsuit against Tyson Foods alleging misrepresentations concerning the marketing of “climate-smart” beef, and the SEC filed an enforcement action against the manufacturer of coffee machines concerning statements about the recyclability of coffee pods. Both actions focused on allegedly misleading advertising concerning environmental issues and the potential impact of said advertising on consumers.

To be clear, this focus on consumer products in greenwashing litigation is not a new development. Greenwashing has been a typical focus in ESG litigation, and consumer products have often featured in such litigation--for the altogether unsurprising reason that consumer-focused goods feature advertising directed at consumers that can allegedly contain misrepresentations concerning the environment. Nonetheless, these recent lawsuits demonstrate the continuing focus on consumer products in greenwashing litigation, and suggest that further lawsuits or enforcement actions may be filed against similarly-situated companies.

A consumer-protection lawsuit filed Wednesday alleges that Tyson Foods is misleading consumers with claims about its efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmental Working Group, an advocacy group, accused the company of taking advantage of the “well-intentioned preferences” of shoppers by making false statements in marketing materials, like saying it was working toward “net-zero” emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050 and by advertising “climate-smart” beef.

Industrialized beef production, the lawsuit contends, will never be “climate-smart” because of the sheer volume of emissions produced in the process of raising cows on an industrial scale. It also argued that the company had shown no evidence of an effort to get to net-zero emissions, a term used by governments and companies to signal their climate goals.

www.nytimes.com/...

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Mintz

Written by:

Mintz
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Mintz on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide