Second Circuit Held that Central New York Municipal Transit Services Changes in Signage Without Additional Structural Changes to Accommodate Passengers Utilizing Wheelchairs Did Not Violate Accessibility Provisions of ADA

Marshall Dennehey
Contact

Marshall Dennehey

Woods v. Centro of Oneida, Inc., 2024 WL 2888492, No. 22-2629 (2d Cir. June 10, 2024)

In an interesting matter addressing the requirement of busing operations to comply with the American Disabilities Act (ADA), the plaintiff argued that the defendants failed to comply with the ADA on numerous grounds. As an initial matter, the plaintiff argued that the defendants failed to make structural changes, including installation of wheelchair-accessible landing pads at existing bus stops and, in turn, when the defendants added signage denoting wheelchair accessible stops, they were negligent for failing to then make the aforementioned structural changes. The Second Circuit held that the ADA does not require structural changes if the bus stops are otherwise accessible. The lack of these changes did not deprive the plaintiff of “meaningful access” to bus service. Moreover, the Second Circuit noted that the defendants had made non-structural changes, such as allowing drivers of paratransit buses to slightly alter bus stops and drop-off points for safety purposes.

Written by:

Marshall Dennehey
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Marshall Dennehey on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide