In this month’s update, we discuss Russian-seized planes, Starbucks-caused traffic jams, a squabble over the use of a family name, a restaurant’s pandemic-based loss, a poorly built house, and whether insurance covers any of these claims. We begin with the restaurant’s business interruption claim. There, the California Supreme Court had to decide whether a virus endorsement gave the illusion of coverage.
Please see full publication below for more information.
