Six State Attorney Generals Object to Proposed AI Enforcement Moratorium

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact

Fox Rothschild LLP

The Attorney Generals of California, Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, Oregon and Vermont wrote a letter June 23, 2025 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, objecting to a proposed AI enforcement moratorium that is in the One Big Beautiful Bill.

The key arguments against the ban are:

  • States have played a leading role in developing strong privacy and technology protections.
  • Existing state privacy laws already address substantial privacy harms posed by AI.
  • Artificial intelligence systems pose immediate and tangible privacy risks that cannot wait a decade for federal action.
  • The often-cited concerns about a patchwork of state laws are overstated, as states regularly work together and build upon one another’s legislative frameworks, creating coherent approaches that respect both innovation and consumer protection.
  • Restricting state action is also not consistent with established federal privacy law frameworks.
  • The moratorium would create a regulatory vacuum that benefits AI developers at the expense of privacy rights.

Read the letter here.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Fox Rothschild LLP

Written by:

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Fox Rothschild LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide