Special Report - FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine: Conscience Rights Implications for Healthcare Providers

The Supreme Court of the United States’s (SCOTUS’s) unanimous decision in Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (FDA v. AHM) on June 13, 2024, articulated a much more absolute view of the protections federal law affords to individual healthcare provider personnel to refuse to participate in the provision of certain healthcare for personal conscience reasons than has ever previously been articulated in the text, legislative history or judicial interpretation of the relevant federal statutes. That aspect of SCOTUS’s decision may lead to a significant uptick in the number of conscience-based opt-out requests that healthcare provider organizations receive from members of their workforces (e.g., physicians, nurses), while simultaneously making each such request more difficult to address without significant cost or liability exposure.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© McDermott Will & Schulte

Written by:

McDermott Will & Schulte
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

McDermott Will & Schulte on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide