Novipax Holdings LLC v. Sealed Air Corporation, No. N17C-03-1682 (November 28, 2017)
This is an interesting decision because it explains: (1) when a fraud claim may be brought despite anti-reliance provisions in a contract and (2) when a fraud claim does not overlap and is thereby precluded by a contract claim based on similar facts. In each case, the inquiry is very fact specific.
