The Earned Wage Access Boom: Sixteen States Propose Legislation to Regulate These Types of Products

McGlinchey Stafford
Contact

McGlinchey Stafford

Since the beginning of 2025, sixteen states have proposed legislation to regulate earned wage access. These states would join Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, South Carolina, and Wisconsin, which have each enacted legislation to regulate advances of funds so employees can access their funds before payday.

Generally, these bills aim to regulate providers of direct-to-consumer or employer-integrated wage access service. Earned wage access is generally defined as advances that are based on a consumer’s earned but unpaid wages. The proposed bills exacerbate the current lack of consistency in the earned wage space, as some states consider the product a “loan” while other states expressly exclude the product from their state’s definition of “loan.” In addition to proposing substantive requirements, these products vary in treatment of common fees such as voluntary tipping and expedited transfer fees. States have also proposed licensing or registration regimes for providers of earned wage access.

The following states have introduced earned wage access legislation:

  1. Arizona SB 1582
  2. Colorado HB 1020
  3. Connecticut HB 5007
  4. Indiana HB 1125
  5. Maryland HB 1294
  6. Mississippi HB 1307 / SB 2496
  7. Missouri HB 576 / SB 293 / HB 1113
  8. New Mexico HB 59
  9. New York AB 258 / AB 682
  10. North Dakota HB 1393
  11. Oklahoma HB 2086 / SB 781
  12. Oregon HB 2131 / SB 481
  13. Texas SB 938 / HB 2043
  14. Utah HB 279
  15. Vermont HB 99
  16. Washington HB 1063

It is fair to say that the boom of legislation in the earned wage access space arose as the result of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Proposed Interpretive Rule from July 2024 that categorizes earned wage access products as “credit” subject to the substantive obligations under the federal Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z. The continued lack of consistency from state to state, and potentially between state and federal obligations, creates tension with compliance obligations including but not limited to finance charge treatment and required disclosures.


Reprinted with permission from the American Bar Association’s Business Law Today February 2025 Month-In-Brief: Business & Regulated Industries.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© McGlinchey Stafford

Written by:

McGlinchey Stafford
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

McGlinchey Stafford on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide