Washington Supreme Court Denies Appeal of Meal Period Penalty Case

Perkins Coie
Contact

Perkins Coie

In October 2024 we wrote about the Washington State Court of Appeals’ opinion in Androckitis v. Virginia Mason Medical Center, which held that the remedy for meal period violations includes three components: (1) payment of time worked during the meal period; plus (2) 30 minutes of pay as a penalty; plus (3) double damages on unpaid amounts as a willfulness enhancement. 

We noted in the update that the penalty pay rule from Androckitis breaks new ground because Washington’s meal period laws and regulations do not authorize penalties. 

Following the court’s opinion, Virginia Mason requested review from the Washington State Supreme Court. However, the state’s highest court recently declined to hear the case in short form with no explanation: “Petition for review denied.”

Takeaways

Although the holding from Androckitis may be clarified and refined by the lower courts, the issue is not likely to reach the Washington State Supreme Court anytime soon. Therefore, businesses with hourly employees in Washington should consult with trusted legal counsel if they have questions about their meal period and pay policies following the decision.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Perkins Coie

Written by:

Perkins Coie
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Perkins Coie on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide