The final approval hearing of House v. NCAA—widely recognized as a landmark decision that will fundamentally alter the future of college athletics—was held today, April 7, 2025. The hearing’s main objective is to allow objectors to present their arguments and concerns before U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken.
Objectors have four primary concerns with the settlement:
The proposed $28 billion back pay for past student-athletes is insufficient and should be calculated See more +
The final approval hearing of House v. NCAA—widely recognized as a landmark decision that will fundamentally alter the future of college athletics—was held today, April 7, 2025. The hearing’s main objective is to allow objectors to present their arguments and concerns before U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken.
Objectors have four primary concerns with the settlement:
The proposed $28 billion back pay for past student-athletes is insufficient and should be calculated at a higher figure.
The $20.5 million cap on the annual revenue share that schools would be required to share with student-athletes goes against the spirit of previous court analyses.
The roster limits may negatively impact preferred walk-ons and overall talent development.
The projected distribution of settlement funds—with an estimated 75 percent predicted to go to football—raises Title IX gender equity concerns.
Judge Wilken is not expected to make a decision immediately, however, if this all-or-nothing settlement is approved, key changes are likely to take effect starting in the 2025-26 academic year.
Amundsen Davis Partner, Luke Fedlam breaks down the settlement hearing and what we can expect after the final ruling. See less -
