Wyoming Requires Insurer Prejudice for Late Notice

Troutman Pepper Locke
Contact

The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled on August 17, 2016 that an insurer “must be prejudiced before being entitled to deny coverage when the insured has failed to give notice ‘as soon as practicable.’” In addressing a certified question from the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Wyoming opinion said it is joining 38 other states with a notice-prejudice rule. Under the rule, the Court held that a late notice determination requires that there first be a determination that notice was untimely and then a finding that the insurer was prejudiced. The Court also rejected the insurer’s language that said late notice could preclude coverage “whether [the insurer] is prejudiced or not,” saying that the provision was against the public policy supporting the notice-prejudice rule.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Troutman Pepper Locke

Written by:

Troutman Pepper Locke
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Troutman Pepper Locke on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide