News & Analysis as of

Abstract Ideas United States Patent and Trademark Office Computer-Related Inventions

King & Spalding

Live Long and Patent: Lessons from Captain Kirk’s Encounter with the PTAB

King & Spalding on

In a tale that boldly goes where few celebrity inventors have gone before, William Shatner—yes, that William Shatner—alongside two co-inventors, filed a patent application for a “Smartphone Organization System and...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

How To Patent Software And Computer-Implemented Business Methods In The US And Abroad

Fox Rothschild LLP on

It is well known that in the U.S., abstract ideas, laws of nature, natural phenomena, and products of nature are all excluded from patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This article briefly outlines various U.S. approaches to...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

How to Successfully Obtain Blockchain Patents

As with other rapidly-evolving technologies, the blockchain space is experiencing a frenzy of patent activity. The data shows that there are 3-4 times as many published applications as there are issued patents for these...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

On the Patent Eligibility of Graphical User Interfaces: Part I

The evolution of graphical user interfaces parallels the evolution of computing technology itself.  As computers grow more powerful and sophisticated, so does their ability to display cutting-edge representations of...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Patent Prosecution Tool Kit: Update on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility & Abstract Ideas

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. CLS Bank, patent stakeholders have faced many difficulties navigating the world of patent-eligibility. Through many Federal Circuit decisions and Guidance given by the U.S....more

Holland & Knight LLP

USPTO Designates Ex Parte Linden as an Informative § 101 PTAB Decision

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), on occasion, publishes certain Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions as precedential or informative. An informative decision provides PTAB norms on recurring issues,...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

PTAB Designates as Informative Three Decisions on Obviousness and Patent Eligibility

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently designated three more decisions as informative, bringing the total number of informative decisions to 13 for 2019. Two decisions—one final and one on institution—address...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

USPTO's October 2019 Update to 35 U.S.C. § 101 Patent Eligibility Guidance

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) recently released October 2019 Patent Eligibility Guidance Update (“October 2019 Update”), which supplements the Guidance issued on January 7, 2019 (“2019 Guidance”)....more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Updated Guidance on Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On October 17, 2019, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a 22-page updated guidance document on subject matter eligibility under 35 USC §101.  Subject matter eligibility is becoming increasingly important in the...more

Fish & Richardson

Patenting Software: A Case Study in Overcoming Alice

Fish & Richardson on

In 2014, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, et al., 573 U.S. 208, which significantly altered the patentability of software, business methods,...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Abstract Idea Analysis Not Always So Concrete

A divided panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court, finding that a claimed method for monitoring and analyzing a computer network was directed to an improvement in computer...more

Cooley LLP

Alert: USPTO Revised Patent Eligibility Guidelines Significantly Eases Path to Obtaining Computer-Related Patents

Cooley LLP on

On January 7, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance, a major update to the examination guidelines for evaluating whether a patent claim...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Global Patent Prosecution - February 2019: 5 Things To Know About USPTO’s New Eligibility Guidance

On January 7, 2019, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued new guidance on Patent Eligibility, seeking to improve the overall clarity, consistency, and predictability of patent eligibility analysis performed by...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Global Patent Prosecution Newsletter - February 2019

USPTO’s New Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility - Few areas of patent law are as unsettled as subject matter eligibility. To improve clarity, consistency, and predictability, the USPTO recently published new guidance on...more

Knobbe Martens

Big Picture on Software Patent Eligibility: The Forces at Work

Knobbe Martens on

Much of the modern economy is driven by software development. Companies are creating and refining new apps that run on mobile devices, and using machine learning to provide users with personalized user interfaces and...more

Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.

Software Patents Get a Lifeline

Recent USPTO Guidance Offers Insight for Software Patent Eligibility - By now most of you have probably heard that "software patents" and "software patent applications" have had a rough time for the past 4 ½ years. Some of...more

WilmerHale

USPTO Issues Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance and Guidance for Examining Computer-Implemented Functional Claims...

WilmerHale on

The USPTO has issued updated guidance for examiners and administrative patent judges (APJs) relating to subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 and examining computer-implemented functional claim limitations under 35...more

K&L Gates LLP

USPTO Clarifies Alice/Mayo Step 2A With New Patent Subject-Matter Eligibility Guidance

K&L Gates LLP on

For the last several years, a major part of prosecuting software-related patents at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has been dealing with the USPTO’s inconsistent interpretation of patent subject-matter...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Federal Circuit Affirms Rejection of Broad, Computer-Based Claims

As we’ve covered in other summaries, the Federal Circuit continues to define the line between computer-implemented claims that are patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for being directed to an abstract idea with no...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Global Patent Prosecution Newsletter - November 2018: Blockchain-ing Alice?

Over the past few years, a dramatic number of blockchain-related patent applications have been filed at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). Blockchain innovations may be categorized as software-use cases and thus may...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Global Patent Prosecution Newsletter - October 2018: How To Do The Two-Step In The United States: The Current State of...

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Mayo and Alice decisions, uncertainty has surrounded what inventions are patent eligible in the United States. In Mayo and Alice, the Supreme Court developed a two-step test to determine...more

Blank Rome LLP

Out of Wonderland from Diehr to Aatrix: Three Steps to Overcoming 101 Rejections – Part II

Blank Rome LLP on

This second part of a two-part article discusses four decisions by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit finding subject matter eligibility under step 2 of Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, et...more

Blank Rome LLP

Out of Wonderland from Diehr to Aatrix: 3 Steps to Overcoming 101 Rejections

Blank Rome LLP on

Post-Alice, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) is aggressively rejecting software claims under the Alice two-part test, the parameters of which many examiners are still trying to understand. Not...more

Snell & Wilmer

Intellectual Property Misconceptions Debunked

Snell & Wilmer on

Many people have misperceptions about what intellectual property (IP) protects, and some common IP misconceptions are debunked below. (1) Ideas Cannot Be Patented. Only inventions can be patented. The legal...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back For Software Patents At The Federal Circuit

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In the past year, several Federal Circuit decisions defined situations in which software inventions could be eligible for patenting in the United States. However, two recent Federal Circuit decisions show that the path for...more

42 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide