News & Analysis as of

Amgen Intellectual Property Protection Pharmaceutical Industry

Venable LLP

Spotlight On: Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim) / Fulphila® (pegfilgrastim-jmdb) / Udenyca® (pegfilgrastim-cbqv) / Ziextenzo®...

Venable LLP on

Pegfilgrastim Challenged Claim Types in IPR and Litigation: Claims include those challenged in litigations and IPRs. Claims are counted in each litigation and IPR, so claims from the same patent challenged in multiple...more

Morgan Lewis

Blockbuster Biologics Review | Issue 26

Morgan Lewis on

Welcome to our quarterly update relating to biologics and biosimilars, including post-grant and patent litigation challenges to blockbuster biologics. Since the enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more

Venable LLP

Celltrion and Amgen Reach Settlement in Prolia® / Xgeva® Biosimilar Litigation

Venable LLP on

On January 24, 2025, Amgen announced it had reached a settlement with Celltrion in Case No. 1:24-cv-06497 (D.N.J.) related to Celltrion’s proposed biosimilar of Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab), CT-P41....more

Venable LLP

Amgen and Sandoz Settle Prolia® / Xgeva® Biosimilar Litigation

Venable LLP on

Amgen and Sandoz reached a settlement in Case No. 1:23-cv-02406 (D.N.J.) on April 29 just hours before a New Jersey District Court Judge (Christine O’Hearn) was scheduled to announce her ruling on Amgen’s preliminary...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. Otezla® (Apremilast)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Nos. 2022-1147, 2022-1149, 2022-1150, 2022-1151, 2023 WL 2994166 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2023) (Circuit Judges Lourie, Cunningham, and Stark presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from...more

A&O Shearman

Half an hour for a bifurcation: UPC Central Division rejects preliminary objection after first oral hearing

A&O Shearman on

The decision concerns the time of filing and admissibility of a revocation action at the Central Division when a parallel infringement action is filed at a local division (Art. 33(4) UPCA). Art 33(4) UPCA states that...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

Supreme Court confirms full scope enablement standard in Amgen v. Sanofi

This month, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, the closely watched case involving the enablement standard for patent claims, particularly as applied to functionally defined genus claims. Genus...more

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

The More You Claim, The More You Must Enable: SCOTUS Delivers Amgen v. Sanofi Opinion

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP on

In May, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, which addressed the statutory enablement requirement for patents. The decision is consistent with ongoing efforts to strike a...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Affirms Lack of Enablement for Amgen’s Patent Claims

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Summary - In Amgen v. Sanofi, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the District of Delaware and Federal Circuit findings that Amgen’s functionally defined patent claims to a class of therapeutic antibodies are invalid as...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

SUPREME COURT RULING: Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi et al, May 18, 2023

Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi et al, No. 21-757 (S. Ct. May 18, 2023) The Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision today concerning the enablement requirement found in Section 112 of the Patent Act. Specifically, the...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court Delivers the Final Blow to Amgen

The questions from the high court during oral argument at the end of March 2023 were fairly telling of the 9-0 ruling that came down yesterday in Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi (No. 21-757). In fact, it did not come as much of a...more

Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP

[Webinar] Is Your Life Sciences Patent Enabled? - March 14th, 12:00 pm PT

U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide This Year - In this year’s foray into patent law, the Supreme Court will decide whether Amgen’s patent that claims antibodies by functional antigen binding and does not disclose the full...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 2018-2414, 2019-1086, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2020) (Circuit Judges Newman, Lourie, and Taranto presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Goldberg,...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - January 2020

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al., Appeal Nos. 2018-2414, et al. (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2020) - In this appeal from Markman and summary judgment opinions by the district court in a...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Biosimilar Litigation Trends and Lessons Learned in 2019

It has been nearly 10 years since the U.S. Biosimilars Pathway (the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) was enacted. The first biosimilar product in U.S. history was approved and launched in 2015. Ten biosimilars...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

THE COURT DENIED DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE ITS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PLAINTIFF AFTER THE AT-RISK LAUNCH AND SUBSEQUENT SETTLEMENT OF ANOTHER DEFENDANT. Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, No. 16-853-MSG...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

The Court Denied Defendant’s Motion To Enforce Its Settlement Agreement With Plaintiff After The At-risk Launch And Subsequent Settlement Of Another Defendant. ...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Cipla Ltd. v. Amgen Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Cipla Ltd. v. Amgen Inc., No. 19-44-LPS, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74970 (D. Del. May 2, 2019) (Stark, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Sensipar® (cinacalcet HCl); U.S. Patent No. 9,375,405 (“the ’405...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, Civ. No. 16-0853 (MSG), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125631 (D. Del. July 27, 2018) (Goldberg, J.)....more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Amgen v. Adello: A Blind Biosimilar Infringement Lawsuit

Last month, Amgen sued Adello Biologics, a US-based biosimilar maker, for patent infringement under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA) in connection with Adello’s proposed biosimilar of Amgen’s...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

USPTO Adopts Amgen v. Sanofi, Excises “Newly Characterized Antigen” Test from its Written Description Guidance for Antibody Claims

Last month, the USPTO issued a memorandum to its patent examining corps clarifying its guidance concerning the written description requirement for claims drawn to antibodies. In the memorandum, the USPTO adopts the Federal...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Alkem Labs. Ltd.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Alkem Labs. Ltd., Civ. No. 17-cv-815-GMS, -817-GMS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208124 (D. Del. Dec. 19, 2017) (Sleet, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Sensipar® (cinacalcet HCl); U.S. Patent...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

Skipping The Patent Dance: U.S. Supreme Court In Amgen V Sandoz Makes It More Difficult For Patent Owners To Delay Marketing Of...

Ladas & Parry LLP on

On June 12, 2017, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Thomas in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., the United States Supreme Court considered the complex statutory scheme that attempts to expedite resolution of patent...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - November 2016

Smart & Biggar on

Federal Court of Appeal opines on the framework for analyzing obviousness-type double-patenting - On November 4, 2016, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal in Apotex Inc v Eli Lilly Canada Inc, 2016 FCA...more

24 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide