News & Analysis as of

Anti-Kickback Statute › Medical Devices

The Anti-Kickback Statute is a United States federal criminal statute that prohibits the exchange (or the promise to exchange) of anything of value for referrals of federal healthcare program business. The... more +
The Anti-Kickback Statute is a United States federal criminal statute that prohibits the exchange (or the promise to exchange) of anything of value for referrals of federal healthcare program business. The statute aims to prevent situations where government officials channel federal healthcare dollars towards particular providers, who have offered or given the official a personal benefit. Penalties for violation of the Anti-Kickback statute apply to both sides of a prohibited transaction and can include jail time and steep monetary fines. less -
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

False Claims Act Settlements to Know from the First Half of 2025

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

With the first half of 2025 in the rearview mirror, the government’s continued focus on False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement shows no signs of slowing. In fact, the Department of Justice recently announced the results of a...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Vendor Fees Flagged as Kickback Risk in HHS OIG Advisory Opinion

Epstein Becker & Green on

On July 7, 2025, the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) for the Department of Health and Human Services published Advisory Opinion 25-08 (“AO 25-08”), an unfavorable and strongly worded opinion interpreting the “arranging...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

“Longstanding and Clear”: OIG Continues Characteristic Close Scrutiny of Below-Market Benefits to Referral Sources

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) recently released two unfavorable advisory opinions, OIG Advisory Opinion No. 25-04 and -08 (the “Opinions”) to medical device...more

Morgan Lewis - Health Law Scan

OIG’s Advisory Opinion No. 25-08: Negative Opinion Highlights Potential Broad Reach of AKS

Morgan Lewis - Health Law Scan on

In a relatively rare move, the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) recently issued an unfavorable Advisory Opinion (No. 25-08) (Opinion) reinforcing the agency’s expansive view of the...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Healthcare Regulatory Check-Up Newsletter | June 2025 Recap

McDermott Will & Schulte on

This issue of McDermott’s Healthcare Regulatory Check-Up highlights regulatory activity for June 2025, including a new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) innovation model; proposed rules with significant...more

Baker Donelson

OIG Advisory Opinion 25-08: Unfavorable DME – Vendor Payment Arrangement

Baker Donelson on

On July 1, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued Advisory Opinion 25-08, an unfavorable opinion discussing a proposed arrangement in which a medical device company...more

Hogan Lovells

OIG issues two unfavorable decisions, cautions against some customer service fees paid by manufacturers

Hogan Lovells on

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued two unfavorable decisions in Advisory Opinions (AOs) 25-04 and 25-08 (the “Opinions”), finding that some service fees paid by...more

ArentFox Schiff

Navigating OIG’s Advisory Opinion on Medical Device Billing Arrangements and Anti-Kickback Statute Risks

ArentFox Schiff on

On July 1, the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (OIG) released Advisory Opinion No. 25-08, issuing an unfavorable determination regarding a proposed arrangement in which a medical device...more

Venable LLP

OIG Reminds Us that Flat Fee Business Arrangements Aren’t Immune from AKS Scrutiny

Venable LLP on

On July 1, 2025, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued Advisory Opinion No. 25-08, concluding that a medical device manufacturer’s proposed payment to access a...more

Epstein Becker & Green

New OIG Advisory Opinion Approves Manufacturer’s Warranty for Injuries Caused by Medical Device

Epstein Becker & Green on

On June 30, 2025, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services posted Advisory Opinion 25-05 (AO 25-05) to its website....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Office of Inspector General Highlights Flat Fee Structures Not Immune From Anti-Kickback Statute

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) published Advisory Opinion 25-08 (Opinion) on July 7, 2025, highlighting the limitations of the often-leveraged Personal Services and...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

OIG Issues Unfavorable Advisory Opinion: Provision of Free Services to Referral Sources Creates Kickback Risk

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Key Points - - The Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) has issued Advisory Opinion No. 25-04 (AO 25-04), its first advisory opinion of the year addressing a proposed arrangement...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

OIG Declines to Approve Medical Device Company's Proposal to Subsidize Screening Costs

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

On June 20, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) published Advisory Opinion 25-04, in which it declined to approve a proposal by a medical device company (Requestor) to pay the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

OIG Says Medical Device Company's Proposal to Pay for Exclusion Screening for Customers May Violate the Anti-Kickback Statute

Epstein Becker & Green on

On June 20, 2025, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) issued an unfavorable advisory opinion - OIG Advisory Opinion 25-04 (“AO 25-04”)....more

Gardner Law

Can Companies Fund Diagnostic Testing for Conditions Their Product Treats?

Gardner Law on

Many FDA-regulated companies are exploring ways to support diagnostic testing, especially when early diagnosis can impact treatment options. However, funding diagnostic testing tied to a company’s own product raises important...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Seventh Circuit Rejects Extension of AKS to Marketing Companies Without Evidence of Intent to Induce Referrals

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently rejected an effort by the federal government to extend the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) to a marketing company in the absence of influence by the company over...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Speaker Programs: Two Recent Enforcement Actions Serve as a Reminder of the Government's Longstanding Scrutiny

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

The pharmaceutical and medical device industries have long utilized speaker programs, which typically involve retaining health care professionals to speak or present on the companies’ products to educate their peers. Speaker...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Limitations to the Anti-Kickback Statute? Seventh Circuit Reverses Conviction Finding “Aggressive” Marketing Tactics Insufficient...

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

On April 14, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the conviction of the owner of a durable medical equipment (“DME”) distributor, ruling that there was insufficient evidence to support a...more

King & Spalding

Seventh Circuit Reverses AKS Conviction Involving Payments to Marketers and DME Manufacturer

King & Spalding on

On April 14, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its opinion in United States v. Sorensen, No. 24-1557, reversing the criminal conviction of Mark Sorensen, the owner of SyMed Inc., a...more

ArentFox Schiff

What Life Sciences Companies Need to Know in 2025

ArentFox Schiff on

Key Insights for Pharma Manufacturers Regarding the AKS - In a series of recent legal challenges initiated by the pharmaceutical industry against the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General...more

Blank Rome LLP

Seventh Circuit Decision Clarifies Distinction Between Face-to-Face Sales and Advertising Under the Anti-Kickback Statute

Blank Rome LLP on

Overview - In a significant decision, United States v. Sorensen, --- F.4th ----, 2025 WL 1099080 (7th Cir. Apr. 14, 2025), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the conviction of Mark...more

Epstein Becker & Green

New Seventh Circuit Decision Signals Greater Flexibility for Healthcare Marketing Services

Epstein Becker & Green on

On April 14, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a decision in a case involving the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) and marketing services that the court framed as an appeal...more

BakerHostetler

The Seventh Circuit Narrows AKS Scope for 1099 Marketers and Advertisers

BakerHostetler on

On April 14, the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Sorensen issued a decision reversing a jury conviction and narrowing the scope of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) as applied to marketers and advertisers....more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Seventh Circuit Reverses AKS Conviction Involving Allegations of Illegal Marketing and Advertising

ArentFox Schiff on

Seventh Circuit Reverses AKS Conviction Involving Allegations of Illegal Marketing and Advertising - On April 14, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the criminal conviction of Mark Sorensen after a...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

13th Annual Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review - 2024

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Bass, Berry & Sims is pleased to announce the release of the 13th annual Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review examining important healthcare fraud developments in 2024. Compiled by the firm's Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Task Force,...more

192 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide