News & Analysis as of

Appeals › Bankruptcy Court › Bankruptcy Plans

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Fifth Circuit Holds that Gatekeeping and Injunction Provisions in Bankruptcy Plans Cannot Shield Non-Debtors From Liability

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

On March 18, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in In re Highland Capital Mgmt., L.P., that a plan’s gatekeeping and injunction provisions could not extend to claims against most non-debtors...more

Bracewell LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Review of Challenge to Equitable Mootness Doctrine

Bracewell LLP on

In a decision that will likely impact bankruptcy proceedings around the country, the Supreme Court recently denied the petition for writ of certiorari of David Hargreaves, which challenged the equitable mootness doctrine. As...more

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,...

Eleventh Circuit Refuses to Impose a ‘Least Sophisticated Consumer’ Standard to Discharge Violations

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,... on

The Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed a Florida bankruptcy court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for sanctions. In doing so, the Court rejected the consumer’s attempt to import the FDCPA’s “least sophisticated consumer”...more

ArentFox Schiff

In the Third Circuit, an Intercreditor Agreement Means What it Says

ArentFox Schiff on

The Plain Meaning Language of an Intercreditor Agreement Determines Whether it Governs Plan Distributions or Adequate Protection Payments - In a recent non-precedential opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the...more

Snell & Wilmer

Is a Bankruptcy Plan that Violates Federal Criminal Law Proposed in Bad Faith?

Snell & Wilmer on

Although legal in many states, marijuana remains illegal under federal criminal law. See 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1). One would think that engaging in illegal activity under federal criminal law would preclude relief under federal...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Fourth Circuit Upholds Requirement That Appellant Have an Economic Stake in Outcome of Appeal to Be a ‘Person Aggrieved’ and Boots...

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer on

In a one-paragraph affirmance of the lower court, in Mar-Bow Value Partners LLC v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US LLC (In re Alpha Natural Resources Inc., Nos. 17-2268; 17-2269 (4th Cir. Sept. 6, 2018), the...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

United States Supreme Court Holds that Order Denying Plan Confirmation Is Not Immediately Appealable

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On May 4, 2015, the Supreme Court for the United States unanimously held that an order denying confirmation of a plan is not a “final” order subject to immediate appeal as a matter of right. Although the Bullard decision...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide