News & Analysis as of

Appeals › But For Causation › Statutory Interpretation

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

First Circuit Requires But-for Causation for AKS-Based FCA Liability, Bolsters Majority View

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP on

What is the proper causation standard for an Anti-Kickback Statute violation to trigger liability under the False Claims Act? The First Circuit has answered that question in a much anticipated interlocutory decision in...more

McCarter & English, LLP

Federal Courts Decide on FCA Claims Actions

McCarter & English, LLP on

There are still several unsettled legal issues regarding the standards applicable to a False Claims Act (FCA) claim, such as the standard to prove causation when an FCA claim is based on a violation of the Anti-Kickback...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

First Circuit Decision Raises Bar on Anti-Kickback Statute-Premised Liability Under the False Claims Act

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC on

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently joined the Sixth Circuit (2023) and Eighth Circuit (2022) in holding that the term “resulting from” in the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) (as amended in...more

Goodwin

First Circuit Adopts Defense-Friendly “But-For” Causation Standard for AKS-Predicated FCA Claims

Goodwin on

In a unanimous panel opinion filed on February 18, 2025, the First Circuit held that False Claims Act cases predicated on violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), require proof that alleged kickbacks were the...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide