News & Analysis as of

Appeals › Court of Federal Claims › Standing

Wiley Rein LLP

Federal Circuit Holds En Banc That Only “Actual or Prospective Bidders or Offerors” May Protest at COFC

Wiley Rein LLP on

WHAT: In Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in a 7-4 en banc decision that the definition of “interested party” under the Tucker Act (28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1)) remains...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government...

Bid Protest Spotlight: Instructions, Price Evaluation, Standing

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government... on

This month’s bid protest roundup highlights three protest decisions released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in March. The first discusses an...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

New Court of Federal Claims Decision Is an Opportunity for Prospective Bidders

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

• A potential offeror may have jurisdiction to protest a government insourcing decision at the Court of Federal Claims. • This issue will likely need to be resolved by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. ...more

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints

Federal Circuit Rules that Starr International Lacks Standing to Pursue Class Claims Stemming from the U.S. Government’s...

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints on

On May 9, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) affirmed in part and reversed in part an earlier decision from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which had held that aspects of the...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide