News & Analysis as of

Appeals Eminent Domain

Nossaman LLP

Project Planning and Acquisition Negotiations Do Not Trigger Inverse Condemnation Liability

Nossaman LLP on

Planning and constructing public infrastructure projects takes significant time – sometimes many years. Property owners and businesses who may be impacted are left in a state of limbo, not knowing for sure whether the project...more

Nossaman LLP

Inverse Condemnation Liability Does Not Extend to Failure to Prevent Actions of Another Party

Nossaman LLP on

Can a public entity be held liable for inverse condemnation when it fails to prevent another party from causing damage to private property?  This one is pretty simple:  the answer is no....more

Ballard Spahr LLP

PA Supreme Court Clarifies Land Valuation Rules in Pignetti v. PennDOT

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a significant victory for property owners in Pignetti v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has relaxed the standard for establishing that two noncontiguous parcels of...more

Snell & Wilmer

Tenth Circuit Revives Takings Claims for Public Use of Property Held Under the State’s Unclaimed Property Act

Snell & Wilmer on

In a decision that may reshape how states administer their unclaimed property statutes, the Tenth Circuit held that property owners can pursue takings claims against the Colorado State Treasurer (Treasurer) without exhausting...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

Common Questions about Eminent Domain

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

Protecting Your Rights in Eminent Domain Cases - At our firm, we’re committed to ensuring the government doesn’t overstep its authority. Understanding the limits of the government’s eminent domain powers can give you...more

Nossaman LLP

Arizona Court of Appeals Holds Severance Damages Unavailable for Homeowners Whose Easements were Extinguished in Eminent Domain

Nossaman LLP on

The Arizona Court of Appeals recently held that members of a homeowners’ association are not entitled to severance damages to their residential parcels when common areas are condemned....more

Bricker Graydon LLP

When the Rubber Doesn’t Meet the Road: Ohio Supreme Court Sends Eminent Domain Dispute over Park Bike Path Back to Trial Court

Bricker Graydon LLP on

The construction of a bike path ran into a bump in the road when the Mill Creek Metropolitan Park District (Park District) attempted to take land through eminent domain. The Park District is a public entity that is attempting...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Inverse Condemnation/Municipal Drainage Pipe Approval: Arkansas Court of Appeals Addresses Taking Claim

The Arkansas Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”) addressed in a February 15th Opinion issues arising out of an inverse condemnation claim. See City of Sherwood v. Clint Bearden, 2023 Ark. App. 67. The inverse...more

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL

Eminent Domain Insight: Ohio Supreme Court Weighs in on Challenging the Necessity of a Public Use in a Utility Condemnation Action

Some might argue that challenging the necessity of an appropriation involving a public utility or common carrier is a futile act, given the presumption of the necessity under R.C. 163.09(B)(1)(c). In State ex rel. Bohlen v....more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Waterworks/Condemnation Proceedings: Arkansas Court of Appeals Addresses Applicable Statutory Authorities

The Arkansas Court of Appeals (“ACA”) addressed in a February 2nd Opinion an issue arising out of a municipality’s use of statutory condemnation authorities to construct a treated-water transmission line....more

Smith Anderson

Fourth Circuit Rejects Federal Jurisdiction Over Claim Against State for Loss of Private Property

Smith Anderson on

A recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concerned a nightmare scenario for any property owner. The plaintiffs sought to rebuild their beachfront house after it was destroyed. Originally...more

Holland & Hart LLP

Looking Beyond the Supreme Court's Eminent Domain Decision in PennEast

Holland & Hart LLP on

On June 29, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC v. New Jersey. PennEast presented the question of whether a private company could condemn a pipeline right-of-way across...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Energy & Climate Counsel

Supreme Court to Decide Eminent Domain Case

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a case that will have far-reaching consequences for interstate pipeline projects. The case, PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey, involves a FERC-approved natural gas pipeline...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - February 3, 2021

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued the following three decisions: Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp, No. 19-351: In this Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) case, the respondents - heirs of...more

Nossaman LLP

Government’s Enforcement of Development Plan Conditions is Not a Taking

Nossaman LLP on

When a property owner commits to developing property in a certain manner, including providing a certain number of parking spaces, and the local government agency enforces the owner’s failure to comply, does the enforcement...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

D.C. Circuit bars long-standing FERC rehearing tolling practice

Bricker Graydon LLP on

On June 30, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, denounced the practice of the secretary of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in issuing tolling orders, which provide FERC with...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

DC Circuit Rejects FERC’s Tolling Authority in Pipeline Certificate Proceedings

Pierce Atwood LLP on

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) can no longer delay judicial review of its orders under the Natural Gas Act by issuing a tolling order that takes no action on a rehearing request other than granting itself...more

(ACOEL) | American College of Environmental...

In re PennEast Pipeline Company: A New Twist in the Pipeline or Established Constitutional Law?

Adding another chapter to the legal controversies that continue to rage over the siting of new gas pipelines, on September 10, 2019 the Third Circuit upheld the State of New Jersey’s sovereign immunity objection to the...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

Appeal Court: City’s Funding of Neighboring Property Restoration Did Not 'Condemn' Restaurant

In an August 2019 decision, the Fourth Department of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York ruled that property owners cannot assert a lawsuit alleging inverse condemnation and other damages...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Mass. Appeals Court Upholds Somerville’s Union Square Revitalization Plan

Pierce Atwood LLP on

In 2012, the City of Somerville, the Somerville Redevelopment Authority (SRA), and the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development approved the Union Square Revitalization Plan (the Plan), an urban renewal...more

Nossaman LLP

Court Decision Serves as Important Reminder on Crafting Lease Condemnation Provisions

Nossaman LLP on

When entering into a lease agreement, parties rarely contemplate that the property may be subject to a future eminent domain proceeding. As a result, many times the condemnation provision in the lease is given little...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

California Court Clarifies Recovery of Goodwill in Eminent Domain Cases

Goodwill is one of the trickier areas of eminent domain law. When a governmental agency takes private property through the exercise of eminent domain powers, the agency generally must pay the property owner the fair market...more

Nossaman LLP

Crafting Settlement Agreements in Eminent Domain

Nossaman LLP on

Like the vast majority of general civil litigation, eminent domain matters usually settle before going to trial. The resolution is typically documented in either a stipulated judgment or a settlement agreement. ...more

Sands Anderson PC

Dwyer v. Town of Culpeper: Final Orders and Virginia Condemnation Law

Sands Anderson PC on

Eminent domain cases in Virginia involve, often, a two-stage process by which to finally resolve the acquisition of private property for public use. At the end of trial, a condemnation jury (or commission) issues a report...more

Nossaman LLP

Court Of Appeal Provides Timely Reminder Regarding A Contractor’s Use Of Property For Staging And Proper Calculation Of Damages...

Nossaman LLP on

In a recent unpublished Court of Appeal decision, Downs v. City of Redding (October 30, 2018), the Court took up two distinct issues: (a) whether a contractor’s use of property for construction staging constitutes a taking...more

45 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide