News & Analysis as of

Appeals › Patent Applications › Today's Popular Updates

Quarles & Brady LLP

New Federal Circuit Decision - Expect Getting AI/Machine Learning Patents Past 101 to Get Tougher

Quarles & Brady LLP on

The Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp., invalidating the patent claims at issue as directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. In what it noted was a case of...more

Sunstein LLP

Trial Court Ruling Threatens Patent Portfolio Development

Sunstein LLP on

A recent decision by a San Francisco federal district court judge imperils the way many significant patent portfolios are developed. In Sonos v. Google, Judge William Alsup held that two patents asserted by Sonos against...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian Patent law 2022: A Year in Review

Smart & Biggar on

2022 was an active year in Canadian patent law. Claim fees were introduced for the first time; changes were made to regulations providing remedies for excessive pricing of patented medicines; and a range of court decisions...more

Proskauer - The Patent Playbook

Update on Artificial Intelligence as a Patent Inventor

Proskauer - The Patent Playbook on

Our previous blog posts, Artificial Intelligence as the Inventor of Life Sciences Patents? and Update on Artificial Intelligence: Court Rules that AI Cannot Qualify As “Inventor,” discuss recent inventorship issues...more

McCarter & English, LLP

License To Sell Kills Patent: Supreme Court Holds Confidential Sales May Invalidate Patents In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. V. Teva...

McCarter & English, LLP on

Can a confidential agreement between a pharmaceutical company and a distributor constitute a patent-invalidating offer for sale of a pharmaceutical product, even if information about the product is never revealed to the...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Hard to Reverse Adverse PTAB Rulings Under Substantial Evidence Standard

McDermott Will & Schulte on

Over a vigorous dissent, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) decision affirming rejection of all pending claims of a patent as being obvious, as supported...more

K&L Gates LLP

BPCIA Statute: Patent Dance Is Optional, But Opting Out Has Consequences

K&L Gates LLP on

The Federal Circuit issued a ruling on July 21, 2015 in the Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sandoz Inc., Case No. 2015-1499, appeal after hearing oral arguments on June 3, 2015. See BPCIA: A “Choose Your Own Adventure” Statute?...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide