News & Analysis as of

Appeals › Property Owners › Inverse Condemnation

Nossaman LLP

Project Planning and Acquisition Negotiations Do Not Trigger Inverse Condemnation Liability

Nossaman LLP on

Planning and constructing public infrastructure projects takes significant time – sometimes many years. Property owners and businesses who may be impacted are left in a state of limbo, not knowing for sure whether the project...more

Nossaman LLP

Inverse Condemnation Liability Does Not Extend to Failure to Prevent Actions of Another Party

Nossaman LLP on

Can a public entity be held liable for inverse condemnation when it fails to prevent another party from causing damage to private property?  This one is pretty simple:  the answer is no....more

White and Williams LLP

California Clarifies Basis for Inverse Condemnation Claims

White and Williams LLP on

Inverse condemnation is a legal theory that is not common in the subrogation industry. However, when dealing with a loss where property damage is the result of action by a public entity, it is a claim that may be available....more

Nossaman LLP

Government’s Enforcement of Development Plan Conditions is Not a Taking

Nossaman LLP on

When a property owner commits to developing property in a certain manner, including providing a certain number of parking spaces, and the local government agency enforces the owner’s failure to comply, does the enforcement...more

Nossaman LLP

“Public Improvement” Narrowly Defined to Limit Inverse Condemnation Liability

Nossaman LLP on

Since the California Supreme Court’s 2019 Oroville decision, which narrowed inverse condemnation liability for public agencies, several court decisions have followed suit. ...more

White and Williams LLP

California Clarifies Its Inverse Condemnation Standard

White and Williams LLP on

In City of Oroville v. Superior Court, 446 P.3d 304 (Cal. 2019), the Supreme Court of California considered whether the City of Oroville (City) was liable to a dental practice for inverse condemnation damages associated with...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

Appeal Court: City’s Funding of Neighboring Property Restoration Did Not 'Condemn' Restaurant

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC on

In an August 2019 decision, the Fourth Department of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York ruled that property owners cannot assert a lawsuit alleging inverse condemnation and other damages...more

Nossaman LLP

Lessons in Litigating Inverse Condemnation Claims

Nossaman LLP on

Inverse condemnation litigation and liability has become a particularly hot topic in California over the last several years. Not many attorneys specialize in this area, and there are a number of traps for the unwary lawyers,...more

Nossaman LLP

California Supreme Court Hears First Inverse Condemnation Case in Years

Nossaman LLP on

On June 5, 2019, the California Supreme Court (“Court”) heard oral argument in the case City of Oroville v. Superior Court of Butte County, Case No. S243247 (“Oroville Case”). This case is notable because it is the first time...more

Nossaman LLP

Crafting Settlement Agreements in Eminent Domain

Nossaman LLP on

Like the vast majority of general civil litigation, eminent domain matters usually settle before going to trial. The resolution is typically documented in either a stipulated judgment or a settlement agreement. ...more

Nossaman LLP

Important New Decision Impacting Legal Issues Motions in California Inverse Condemnation Cases

Nossaman LLP on

As any experienced California eminent domain lawyer knows, there is a unique statutory mechanism that allows parties to bring a legal issues motion to secure a court’s ruling on a litany of issues that impact compensation....more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide