News & Analysis as of

Appeals › Property Owners › Just Compensation

Ballard Spahr LLP

PA Supreme Court Clarifies Land Valuation Rules in Pignetti v. PennDOT

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a significant victory for property owners in Pignetti v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has relaxed the standard for establishing that two noncontiguous parcels of...more

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: Federal Circuit Issues Important Takings Decision on Eviction Moratorium

Jenner & Block on

In a significant Takings Clause opinion, Darby Development Company, Inc. v. United States, the Federal Circuit sided with landlords who argued that the CDC’s eviction moratorium constituted a physical taking of their...more

Nossaman LLP

Arizona Court of Appeals Holds Severance Damages Unavailable for Homeowners Whose Easements were Extinguished in Eminent Domain

Nossaman LLP on

The Arizona Court of Appeals recently held that members of a homeowners’ association are not entitled to severance damages to their residential parcels when common areas are condemned....more

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL

Eminent Domain Insight: Ohio Supreme Court Weighs in on Challenging the Necessity of a Public Use in a Utility Condemnation Action

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL on

Some might argue that challenging the necessity of an appropriation involving a public utility or common carrier is a futile act, given the presumption of the necessity under R.C. 163.09(B)(1)(c). In State ex rel. Bohlen v....more

Smith Anderson

Fourth Circuit Rejects Federal Jurisdiction Over Claim Against State for Loss of Private Property

Smith Anderson on

A recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concerned a nightmare scenario for any property owner. The plaintiffs sought to rebuild their beachfront house after it was destroyed. Originally...more

Nossaman LLP

Government’s Enforcement of Development Plan Conditions is Not a Taking

Nossaman LLP on

When a property owner commits to developing property in a certain manner, including providing a certain number of parking spaces, and the local government agency enforces the owner’s failure to comply, does the enforcement...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Proposed Landfill/Land Acquisition: New York Appellate Court Addresses Taking Issue

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,... on

A New York Appellate Court (Fourth Department) (“Court”) addressed in a November 8th Order an action filed by a potential purchaser of a 50 acre parcel of property against the Town of Carroll, New York alleging a taking...more

Nossaman LLP

Martin's Beach - The Public Taking that Almost Was, and Still May Be

Nossaman LLP on

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” The California Constitution contains a similar provision. Reading these constitutional...more

Nossaman LLP

Crafting Settlement Agreements in Eminent Domain

Nossaman LLP on

Like the vast majority of general civil litigation, eminent domain matters usually settle before going to trial. The resolution is typically documented in either a stipulated judgment or a settlement agreement. ...more

Sands Anderson PC

Dwyer v. Town of Culpeper: Final Orders and Virginia Condemnation Law

Sands Anderson PC on

Eminent domain cases in Virginia involve, often, a two-stage process by which to finally resolve the acquisition of private property for public use. At the end of trial, a condemnation jury (or commission) issues a report...more

Nossaman LLP

Important New Decision Impacting Legal Issues Motions in California Inverse Condemnation Cases

Nossaman LLP on

As any experienced California eminent domain lawyer knows, there is a unique statutory mechanism that allows parties to bring a legal issues motion to secure a court’s ruling on a litany of issues that impact compensation....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court Considers Zoning Merger Case- How does this apply in Southampton Town?

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The stakes could not be higher; would the property yield one or two waterfront building lots? On June 23, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case that involved the merger of two parcels of property...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Colorado Supreme Court Oral Argument Held in Case Deciding Whether Courts and Commissions May Overrule Each Other in Eminent...

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

In June, the Colorado Supreme Court held oral argument in a case that is set to shape the way condemnation actions will be tried to commissions in the future. In Colorado, a landowner has the right to choose whether a jury or...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide