News & Analysis as of

Appellate Courts › Cal Code of Civil Procedure

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Timely Filed, Wrongly Rejected: Court of Appeal Reinforces Summary Judgment Rights

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on

In CFP BDA, LLC v. Superior Court (2025), the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two (Riverside), issued a published opinion that clarifies a recurring procedural dilemma in civil litigation:...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Relying on a Void Quiet Title Judgment — Redux

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP on

In May 2021, Money and Dirt covered a case published by California’s Second Appellate District — Tsasu LLC v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. — holding that under Code of Civil Procedure section 764.060 (part of California’s Quiet...more

Perkins Coie

Bond Properly Required for Challenge to Affordable Housing

Perkins Coie on

A local organization appealed the denial of its challenge to the approval of an affordable housing project and disputed the trial court’s order requiring it to post a bond. The Court of Appeal rejected plaintiff’s contentions...more

Perkins Coie

Suit Challenging Water District’s Ad Valorem Property Tax Was Time-Barred Under the Validation Statutes

Perkins Coie on

A challenge to a water district’s increase in its ad valorem property tax was untimely under the 60-day statute of limitations in the validation statutes. Coachella Valley Water District v. Superior Court (Roberts), No....more

NAM (National Arbitration and Mediation)

A Proposal For Private Judging In New York

NAM (National Arbitration and Mediation) on

The COVID-19 pandemic has thrust a dagger into the heart of our state court system. The Office of Court Administration is to be lauded, however, for its efforts to ensure that appropriate technology has been utilized to...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Arbitration Provision In Plan Provider Agreement May Be Enforceable, California Court Says

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

A California appeals court has ruled that an arbitration provision in a plan provider agreement was enforceable as “Step Two” of its dispute resolution process. In Epstein v. Vision Service Plan, optometrist Gordon Epstein...more

Nossaman LLP

California Supreme Court Determines That Legal Issues Motions Cannot Be Made in Inverse Condemnation Actions

Nossaman LLP on

It is Christmas in July for eminent domain practitioners! We have a California Supreme Court opinion on a condemnation case, which is rare. The case, Weiss v. People ex rel. Department of Transportation (2020 Cal. LEXIS...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide