News & Analysis as of

Appellate Courts › Canada › Statutory Interpretation

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Québec Court of Appeal Finds That Employers May Be Liable for After-Hours Accidents

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

In a recent decision impacting Québec employers and workers, the Court of Appeal of Québec clarified the scope of work-relatedness necessary for an injury to be compensable under the Act respecting industrial accidents and...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Judicial Review Notwithstanding the Charter’s “Notwithstanding” Clause? Yes, Says Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP on

On August 11, 2025, the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (SKCA) released a major decision about section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter), which is colloquially referred to as the “notwithstanding”...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Path for Secondary Picketing Injunctions

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

In Purolator Inc. v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers, 2025 ONCA 565, a split Court of Appeal for Ontario addressed whether a company that is not itself in a labour dispute must proceed under the specialized labour-injunction...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Two Federal Courts Temporarily Strike Down President Trump’s IEEPA Tariffs

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that President Trump lacks authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose his most sweeping tariffs against U.S. trading...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide