News & Analysis as of

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Contract Disputes

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

ASBCA Denies a Service Contractor's Appeal for Additional Labor Costs

The U.S. Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals' recent decision in HD Inc., ASBCA 63794, demonstrates the importance of following the terms of a solicitation when submitting a proposal on federal projects, particularly as...more

Cozen O'Connor

ABSCA: $1.1 Million Reduction Appropriate For Unapproved Foreign-Flag Vessel Use

Cozen O'Connor on

On February 26, 2025, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals issued a decision allowing the government to reduce a contract by $1.1M due to a contractor’s failure to comply with the mandate to use United States-flag...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Amid Uncertainty, Government Contractors Should Document, Notify, and Escalate Claims

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Government contractors working for the Department of Education (DE), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and other agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Consumer Financial...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

Good News for Pandemic-Related Government Contract Claims: McCarthy HITT – Next NGA West JV

PilieroMazza PLLC on

On December 20, 2023, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the Board) denied the government’s motion to dismiss pandemic-related claims. In doing so, the Board rejected the government’s arguments alleging that the...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Federal Circuit Holds “Sum Certain” Requirement for CDA Claims Is Not Jurisdictional

Wiley Rein LLP on

WHAT: After previewing earlier this year that it was reconsidering its existing precedent, the Federal Circuit held yesterday that the requirement that contractors state a “sum certain” in claims brought under the Contract...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Federal Circuit Clarifies When Claims Accrue Under the Contract Disputes Act

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The Contract Disputes Act allows contractors seeking payment of a claim arising from a contract with the federal government six years from the date it accrued to submit the claim to the contracting officer. Failure to do so...more

Stinson - Government Contracting Matters

ASBCA Revisits Email “Signature” and Finds Typed Name Meets the Test

In a departure from its prior precedent, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) recently held in Kamaludin Slyman CSC, ASBCA Nos. 62006, 62007, 62008, that a typed name at the end of an email satisfies the...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

ASBCA Provides Guidance on CENTCOM Default Termination Decision

In Watts Constructors, LLC, (June 24, 2019), the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) provided further guidance on its earlier decision ECC CENTCOM, 18-1 BCA 37,133. ...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

CPARS Evaluations: Are You Stuck with What You Get?

Part 42.15 of the FAR entitles federal contractors to submit comments and receive agency review of an unfavorable performance evaluation in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). If the contractor’s...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

For Government Contractors: Unsigned Claim Certification Is an Incurable Defect

In September, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) addressed the certification requirements under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA). A motion to dismiss by the U.S. Government prompted the ASBCA to consider...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide