News & Analysis as of

Asbestos Jurisdiction

Goldberg Segalla

Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Personal Jurisdiction Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Schenectady Supreme Court, New York - Defendant Fives Giddings & Lewis were sued in New York by plaintiff McCune, based on the allegation that their machinery exposed him to asbestos. Mr. McCune filed this...more

Goldberg Segalla

Illinois Jury Finds for Plaintiff in Wrongful Death Action Involving Asbestos Exposure

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Illinois Circuit Court – Cook County - This lawsuit involved a survival and wrongful death action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) in Illinois.  Plaintiff, Annette Sanders, represented...more

Goldberg Segalla

First Department Affirms New York Jurisdiction Over Automotive Defendants

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department (NY) - In this asbestos action, plaintiffs allege that decedent, John Beagan, was exposed to asbestos-containing products while in work areas of New York car...more

Goldberg Segalla

Appellate Court Affirms Denial of Appellant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals of Minnesota - Appellant Westrock Minnesota Corporation f/k/a Waldorf Corporation (Waldorf), challenged the district court’s ruling, denying summary judgment on respondent’s asbestos-related...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Washington Court Finds No Take-Home Exposure in Asbestos Bench Trial

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In Perkins v. United States, Plaintiff Tristan Perkins sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for her mother Geraldine Perkins’ (“Decedent”) alleged wrongful death due to asbestos exposure. Alleging...more

Goldberg Segalla

Gasket/Packing Manufacturer Prevails after Jury Trial

Goldberg Segalla on

Court:  United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Decedent Arnold L. Pritt was diagnosed with singular mesothelioma, epithelioid type in September 2019. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos during his...more

Goldberg Segalla

New York Holds its Position as a “Judicial Hellhole” in 2024

Goldberg Segalla on

Perhaps unsurprisingly, New York City — and New York City Asbestos Litigation or NYCAL — continues to hold its position as a judicial hellhole in 2024. However, New York City was once ranked second; it is now ranked third,...more

Zelle  LLP

Climate Change Litigation: What Can Liability Insurers Expect in 2024?

Zelle LLP on

Climate litigation against companies is increasing and the stakes are getting higher. Last year saw more headline-making claims being brought against corporations and a slew of important decisions from courts in...more

Goldberg Segalla

Governor Hochul Vetoes Bill Requiring Foreign Corporations to Consent to General Jurisdiction in New York Courts

Goldberg Segalla on

On December 22, 2023, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul vetoed Senate Bill S7476, which provided that a foreign corporation’s application for authority to do business in New York constitutes consent to jurisdiction of New York...more

Goldberg Segalla

NYCAL Judge Finds Jurisdiction Over Automotive Defendant and Denies Summary Judgment

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In this asbestos action, defendant Western Auto moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for summary judgment. Plaintiff Winfield Frederick opposed both...more

Goldberg Segalla

Hawaii Court Grants Motion to Compel Genetic Testing in Asbestos Lawsuit

Goldberg Segalla on

On August 30, 2023, a Hawaii court ruled on 3M’s motion to compel blood sampling for the purposes of genetic testing in an asbestos matter. Hawaii First Circuit Judge James H. Ashford granted 3M’s motion in the McCabe v. 3M...more

Goldberg Segalla

Denial of Talc Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Reversed on Appeal

Goldberg Segalla on

Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District - The plaintiffs, John and Joanne Fleemin, filed the instant products liability lawsuit against numerous defendants, including Lornamead, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its...more

Goldberg Segalla

Helicopter Engine Manufacturer’s Removal Based on Federal-Officer Jurisdiction Upheld

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division - Decedent Gustave Sahm died from lung cancer allegedly caused by asbestos exposure from 1956 to 2020 during his service in...more

Goldberg Segalla

District Court Finds Defendant Has Colorable Federal Officer Statutory Defense, Denies Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana - This is an asbestos-related lawsuit claiming that Shelton Boutte contracted lung cancer from alleged exposure to asbestos during his career as...more

Goldberg Segalla

Case Remanded to California State Court; Plaintiff Awarded Motion Costs and Fees

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of California - In this asbestos action, plaintiff Gary Haeck sued several defendants for causes of action in strict products liability, negligence, fraud, and...more

Goldberg Segalla

Motion to Remand Denied as Defendant’s Removal Timely Under Federal Officer Removal Statute

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana - In this asbestos action, decedent Gayle LeBeau alleged take-home exposure to asbestos from her father and brother’s work at the Avondale...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Judicial Hellhole Ranks for 2022-23 Receive a Significant Shake Up

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The American Tort Reform Foundation (ATR) released its 2022-2023 Judicial Hellhole report. In this report, the ATR ranks the eight most dangerous jurisdictions for corporate defendants and their defense attorneys. This year...more

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiffs Allowed Additional Discovery to Establish Personal Jurisdiction over Hydraulic-Pump Defendant

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Western Division - Plaintiffs William Weaver and Judy Weaver filed suit, claiming that William Weaver was exposed to the defendants’...more

Goldberg Segalla

Brake Manufacturer’s Motion to Dismiss on Personal Jurisdiction Grounds Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, October 6, 2022 - In this asbestos action, Plaintiff George Sweikart alleged that his mesothelioma resulted from exposure to asbestos-containing products, including...more

Goldberg Segalla

Automotive Defendant Obtains Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, July 21, 2022 - In this asbestos action, defendant Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal Inc. as successor-in-interest to The Bendix...more

Goldberg Segalla

Court Grants Equipment Manufacturer’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Denies Plaintiffs’ Request for...

Goldberg Segalla on

State of New York, Supreme Court, County of Monroe, May 16, 2022 - Plaintiffs John and Jayne Gaub commenced an asbestos-related lawsuit on February 22, 2021, against several defendants, including Textron, Inc., sued...more

Goldberg Segalla

Product Manufacturer and Supplier’s Motion to Dismiss Granted for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

Goldberg Segalla on

Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport, February 18, 2022 - In this asbestos action, defendant Ametek, Inc. moved to dismiss the complaint by plaintiffs Maria and Carmelo Patti. The...more

Goldberg Segalla

New York Manages to Remain a “Judicial Hellhole” in 2021

Goldberg Segalla on

While trials and in person court conferences are starting to trickle in, some jurisdictions such as New York still managed to hold its position as a judicial hellhole in 2021. According to American Tort Reform Foundation...more

Maron Marvel

Jurisdictional Analysis Shows Divide on Duty for Take-Home Asbestos Exposure

Maron Marvel on

Jurisdictions are divided on the issue of whether there is a duty in take-home asbestos exposure cases, and while the majority of the states have not specifically addressed the issue in the asbestos exposure context, of those...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Cook County Court Finds Asbestos Plaintiff Failed To Establish Specific Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-Of-State Premises Defendant

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On November 26, 2019, in Eileen Riebel, et al. v. 3M Company, et al. (Case No. 2015-L-002124), Cook County Judge Clare E. McWilliams granted a premises defendant’s personal jurisdiction motion in an asbestos matter finding...more

29 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide