News & Analysis as of

Banking Sector › Fraud › Summary Judgment

Hogan Lovells

UK: “Duty of retrieval” rejected: why banks do not owe a duty to recover funds lost through APP fraud

Hogan Lovells on

Banking fraud of all types is an ever increasing problem in today’s society, and takes a multitude of forms. On a basic level, frauds can be divided into two types. Unauthorised fraud, where the victim does not provide...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

District Court grants summary judgement for bank in “spoofing” case

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

On September 29, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary judgement on all claims in favor of the defendant bank, while denying summary judgement for the New Jersey-based plaintiff. The...more

Winstead PC

Texas Supreme Court Held Bank Was Not Liable For Fraudulent Withdrawals From An Account Due To UCC 4.406

Winstead PC on

In Compass Bank v. Calleja-Ahedo, an identity thief drained the plaintiff’s bank account through a series of fraudulent transactions in 2012 and 2013, and the plaintiff sued his bank to recover the stolen funds. No. 17-0065,...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

2016 Year End Review: Money Laundering Opinions of Note

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The federal courts continued in 2016 to produce a stream of cases pertaining to money laundering. We focus on three below because they involve analysis of basic issues that frequently arise in money laundering litigation....more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide