News & Analysis as of

Biden Administration › Supreme Court of the United States › Clean Air Act

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies Standing for Regulatory Challenges in Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 20, 2025, issued a 7-2 decision in Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA, clarifying when stakeholders have standing to challenge an agency action based on market effects rather than direct...more

McGlinchey Stafford

SCOTUS: Choose the Right Venue in Clean Air Act Issues

McGlinchey Stafford on

On June 18th, the U.S. Supreme Court issued two rulings determining where challenges to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) actions under the Clean Air Act must be filed. The Court held challenges to EPA actions that are...more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

9 Questions About the 2009 Endangerment Finding Reconsideration in 2025

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

Over the course of the last 15 years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed a suite of regulations under the Clean Air Act (CAA) built upon EPA’s finding – originally made in 2009 – that greenhouse gas...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Trump Administration Requests Pauses in Several Supreme Court Cases to Reconsider Biden Administration Policies

Wiley Rein LLP on

On January 24, 2025, the Trump Administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause briefing in several cases on the current merits docket. In making the request, Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris explained that the new...more

ArentFox Schiff

Split Fifth Circuit Panel Upholds $14.25 Million Clean Air Act Decision Hinging on Standing Issues

ArentFox Schiff on

Standing is a major issue in nearly all environmental citizen suit cases. A split panel of the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court’s award of a $14.25 million Clean Air Act (CAA) penalty against a...more

BakerHostetler

West Virginia v. EPA and ‘Major Questions’ Facing the Competition Agencies

BakerHostetler on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 30 decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency will reverberate throughout the administrative state, inviting challenges to agency actions on major policy issues - including...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers

West Virginia v. EPA: Insurers Should Consider How Big of a Bite the U.S. Supreme Court Took Out of the "E" in ESG

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers on

We have written extensively about environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") otherwise known as sustainability, and its impact on insurers and their policyholders. We have pointed out how ESG has impacted insurers qua...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Two and Done: SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

The Court has now delivered its final two decisions of the term, one of them of great consequence to administrative law. With adjournment comes the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer and the swearing-in of his successor,...more

WilmerHale

Despite Carbon Cost Win, Biden Climate Plans Still At Risk

WilmerHale on

On May 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to allow the Biden administration to continue using the social cost of carbon estimates in its regulatory analyses, developed pursuant to an executive order from President Joe Biden. ...more

Mintz

Supreme Court May Limit EPA's Power to Regulate Carbon Emissions

Mintz on

The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an appeal of the D.C. Circuit's decision to strike down Trump-era restrictions--which were quite weak--on coal-burning power plants. The Court's ruling here may limit the ability of...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide