News & Analysis as of

Biosimilars Patent Infringement aBLA

Venable LLP

Genentech Files First BPCIA Litigation Against Perjeta® (pertuzumab) Biosimilar Applicant

Venable LLP on

On August 14, 2025, Genentech filed BPCIA litigation No. 2:25-cv-14648 (D.N.J.) against Shanghai Henlius Biotech (“Henlius”) and Organon alleging infringement of 24 patents by Henlius / Organon’s proposed Perjeta®...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Virtual Conference] Passport to Proficiency on the Essentials of Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA - October 14th - 30th, 1:00 pm EST

ACI’s virtual Annual Passport to Proficiency on the Essentials of Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA equips early-career professionals with the legal and regulatory fluency needed to contribute meaningfully to product strategy and...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Genentech, Inc. v. Immunex Rhode Island Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

In a procedurally unusual decision (but one unsurprising in all other respects), the Federal Circuit on Monday affirmed a district court's denial of a temporary restraining order to keep off the market Amgen's biosimilar...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Amgen Files New Patent Infringement Suit Over Neupogen Biosimilar

On July 23, 2019, Amgen, maker of the cancer treatment drug Neupogen (filgrastim), filed patent infringement claims in the Southern District of California against Tanvex Biopharma over Tanvex’s proposed filgrastim biosimilar...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Prosecution History Estoppel Bars Amgen’s Infringement Claim Under the Doctrine of Equivalents

The Federal Circuit affirmed a district court decision barring Amgen from asserting an infringement claim under the doctrine of equivalents against Coherus Biosciences because Amgen disclaimed all combinations not identified...more

K&L Gates LLP

Amgen v. Sandoz - New Developments in Biosimilars Litigation

K&L Gates LLP on

INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND - On May 8, 2019 in Amgen, Inc. v. Sandoz International GmbH, the Federal Circuit Court affirmed the district court’s judgment, concluding that the district court correctly construed the claims and...more

Fish & Richardson

Amgen v. Sandoz: Final Judgment of Non-Infringement: Clearance for Biologics Still Being Finalized at the Time of Judgment?

Fish & Richardson on

Decisions in the Amgen v. Sandoz case involving Sandoz’s biosimilar versions of Amgen’s Neupogen® and Neulasta® drugs have provided significant guidance to biosimilar litigants over the years.  ...more

Goodwin

Coherus Settles with AbbVie, and Sues Amgen, Over Adalimumab Biosimilars (Updated)

Goodwin on

Coherus announced today that it has executed settlement agreements with AbbVie that grant Coherus global, non-exclusive, royalty-bearing license rights under AbbVie’s intellectual property to commercialize CHS-1420, Coherus’...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

First Decision on Label Carve-Outs for Biosimilars Expected in Enbrel Litigation

As biosimilar litigation between Amgen, the maker of Enbrel® (etanercept), and Sandoz, the maker of biosimilar ErelziTM (etanercept-szzs) heads toward trial before Judge Claire Cecchi in the District of New Jersey, Sandoz is...more

Fish & Richardson

Declaratory Judgment Litigation Brought by Biosimilar Manufacturers

Fish & Richardson on

Courts have begun to shape the contours of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) and the progress of biosimilar litigation, but the use of declaratory judgment actions by biosimilar manufacturers...more

Fish & Richardson

Biosimilars 2017 Year in Review

Fish & Richardson on

Since the passage of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), 2017 has been the most active year yet for drug manufacturers. Fish attorneys Tasha Francis, Jenny Shmuel, and Brianna Chamberlin addressed the...more

Jones Day

Federal Circuit Rules BPCIA Preempts State Law

Jones Day on

On December 14, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit again interpreted the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA"). In Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sandoz Inc., 15-cv-1499 (Fed. Cir. 2017), the...more

Perkins Coie

Federal Circuit Rules Out State-Law Remedies for Failure to Participate in the Biosimilars "Patent Dance"

Perkins Coie on

On December 14, the Federal Circuit issued a decision that further clarifies the ground rules for disclosures of product information by manufacturers of biosimilar pharmaceutical products. In particular, the Federal Circuit...more

Jones Day

Federal Circuit Clarifies Probative Value of Patent Dance Statements

Jones Day on

The Situation: The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act was considered in a November 2017 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Result: The court found that the commercial...more

Fish & Richardson

Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on Probative Value of “Patent Dance” Letters and aBLA Parameters in an Infringement Analysis

Fish & Richardson on

On November 13th, in an opinion drafted by Judge Taranto, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Southern District Court of Florida’s judgment that Apotex’s biosimilar versions of Neulasta® and Neupogen® do not infringe Amgen’s...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2017)

In the third installment of the "Amgen v." trilogy of BPCIA Federal Circuit cases, the Court in Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc. answered a question that had been lingering since the very first case -- can a reference product...more

Fish & Richardson

The Ramifications of Leaving the Patent Dance Floor

Fish & Richardson on

While the Supreme Court held in Amgen v. Sandoz that biosimilar applicants cannot be forced with a federal injunction to provide a copy of their biosimilar application (aBLA) and manufacturing information to the reference...more

Fish & Richardson

The Amgen v. Sandoz Disclosure Disputes Continue

Fish & Richardson on

A theme emerging in biosimilar litigation is when –and how much—discovery is available to reference product sponsors. The Supreme Court in Amgen v. Sandoz grappled with this issue in the spring, as it decided whether...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. (2017)

On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., marking the first time the Court has interpreted the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA") for the approval of...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Amgen Sues Coherus Under BPCIA After Completing Patent Dance

On May 10, 2017, Amgen filed a complaint in the District of Delaware asserting that, under section 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(C)(i) of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”), Coherus infringed Amgen’s U.S....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Sandoz, Amgen, and the Federal Government at the Supreme Court -- Timing of BPCIA 180-Day Notice of Commercial Marketing...

On April 26, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. from Sandoz counsel (Deanne E. Maynard), Amgen counsel (Seth P. Waxman), and presenting the opinion of the United States, an Assistant to...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Sandoz v. Amgen -- Patent Dancing and Missing Puzzle Pieces

On April 26, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. Sandoz was represented by Deanne E. Maynard, and Amgen was represented by Seth P. Waxman. In addition, Anthony A. Yang presented the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Preview -- Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. -- 180 Day Notice of Commercial Marketing Provisions of BPCIA

On Wednesday, April 26, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc, involving interpretation for the first time of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA"), which was enacted...more

Fish & Richardson

How Soon Can A Biosimilar Applicant Be Sued for Patent Infringement?

Fish & Richardson on

Biosimilar manufacturers proceeding under the abbreviated approval pathway laid out in the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) open themselves up to patent infringement litigation. But how soon can a...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Will The Avastin Biosimilar Patent Dance Go On?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Judge Sleet of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware has dismissed Genentech’s complaint against Amgen for allegedly failing to comply with the the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), but...more

50 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide