News & Analysis as of

California › Proposition 65 › Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Beveridge & Diamond PC

EPA Seeks Public Comments on Petition to Amend Pesticide Labeling Requirements

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

Signaling renewed interest in a longstanding area of tension between federal and California labeling requirements for pesticide products, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently extended the public comment...more

DLA Piper

Industrials Regulatory News and Trends - December 2024 #2

DLA Piper on

California amends Prop 65 short-form warnings. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has announced long-expected new amendments to its Prop 65 short-form warning requirements. ...more

ArentFox Schiff

Ninth Circuit Affirms that Businesses Have First Amendment Rights When It Comes to Proposition 65 Warnings

ArentFox Schiff on

On November 7, 2023, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded in National Association of Wheat Growers v. Bonta, that California’s Proposition 65 (Prop 65) cancer warning for glyphosate, a product primarily...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

The Intersection of Prop 65 and Free Speech: A Recent Win for Businesses

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

Under California’s Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”), businesses are required to give “clear and reasonable warnings” to consumers regarding potential chemical exposure if their product contains a chemical “known to the state to...more

King & Spalding

Packaging, Proposition 65, and PFAS – Challenges for Food and Beverage Companies Expand

King & Spalding on

In our article published in the last edition of this Gazette, we discussed late 2021 to early 2022 developments concerning extended producer responsibility (EPR) programs and the regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl...more

MG+M The Law Firm

California Adds PFAS to List of Chemicals Subject to Prop 65 Enforcement Actions

MG+M The Law Firm on

California has just added per- and poly-fluoralkyl substances (PFAS) to the list of chemicals requiring consumer warnings under Proposition 65, meaning that state residents can soon expect to see the words “cancer” and...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Part One – Air, Water, California Proposition 65, and Cannabis

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Cannabis growing and processing operations face increasing regulatory pressure to assess and reduce their environmental impacts – especially in the areas of water quality, air emissions, energy use and sustainability,...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

The Evolving Argument Surrounding Federal Preemption of Proposition 65

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

Ninth Circuit considers whether federal law takes precedence over California statute requiring warnings about chemicals. Hardeman v. Monsanto, pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, raises issues as to whether a...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide